The spacer block technique is widely used in medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) and osteonecrosis (ON), while it is still unclear if there is any difference in the extension gap between UKAs for the two conditions. To clarify the question, the data from 87 consecutive patients (OA: 57 patients and ON: 30 patients) who underwent medial fixed-bearing UKA with the spacer block technique were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The component gap between the medial tibial osteotomy surface and the femoral trial prosthesis in extension was measured using a UKA tensor, and the preosteotomy gap was calculated in each condition. Also, pre- and postoperative coronal hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles, the thickness of the insert, and the amount of distal femoral and proximal tibial osteotomy were measured and compared between the two groups. As a result, the mean preosteotomy gap in Group OA and Group ON was 5.4 and 3.7 mm, respectively ( < 0.001). The amount of change in HKA angle following UKA in Group OA and Group ON was 4.4and 3.8 degrees, respectively ( = 0.044), while no significant difference was found regarding pre- and postoperative HKA angle between them. Also, thinner inserts tended to be used in Group ON than in Group OA, while no significant difference in the amount of osteotomies was found between them. Since knees with OA and ON showed different biomechanical conditions at medial fixed-bearing UKA probably for the difference in the amount of remaining cartilage, the surgical technique should be carefully considered for each condition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785222DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medial fixed-bearing
12
spacer block
12
block technique
12
difference extension
8
extension gap
8
osteoarthritis osteonecrosis
8
fixed-bearing unicompartmental
8
unicompartmental knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8
patients patients
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Metal-backed versus all-poly tibia in the original cartier unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes and survivorship at long-term follow-up.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

December 2024

Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.

Purpose: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option for localized osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis with several advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). UKA implants may feature a tibial component either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB). This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of 74 UKAs over 16 years, focusing on comparing the results and survivorship of MB versus AP tibial tray.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In 2019, a new fixed-bearing implant for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) was introduced that incorporated a round-on-flat design featuring an Oxinium femoral component coupled with a highly crosslinked polyethylene bearing surface. Compared to prior implants, the design featured smaller size increments coupled with medial and lateral-specific tibial baseplates. The objective of this study is to describe our institution's early experience with this UKA implant system by evaluating survivorship, reasons for revision, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The applicability of the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is not yet clear. The current study aimed to address the following questions: 1) what is the distribution of the CPAK classification among patients who underwent medial UKA? and 2) what would be the clinical outcomes for patients whose coronal alignment and joint line obliquity have either changed or been maintained postoperatively?

Methods: This retrospective study involved 325 patients treated with fixed-bearing medial UKA between 2017 and 2019 following a kinematic alignment strategy and using cemented resurfacing implants. Long-leg standing radiographs were utilized for all preoperative and postoperative measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The in-vivo medial and lateral collateral elongation correlated with knee functional score and joint space following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

November 2024

School of Biomedical Engineering & Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Engineering Research Center for Digital Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants & Clinical Translation R&D Center of 3D Printing Technology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address:

Background: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) are paramount for joint stability. Their elongation patterns may change during fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (FB and MB UKA). This study aims to explore the relationship between the elongation of MCL, LCL, and changes in joint space, as well as their correlation with functional scale scores during FB and MB UKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!