A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Rhinoplasty Rosetta Stone: Using Rasch Analysis to Create and Validate Crosswalks between the NOSE and the SCHNOS Functional Subscale. | LitMetric

Background: The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and the Functional subscale of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS-O) are widely used patient-reported outcome measures to measure functional outcomes of rhinoplasty. However, as different instruments produce scores on different metrics, results of these instruments cannot be linked directly, thus hindering comparison and aggregating of rhinoplasty outcome data from practices using either instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate crosswalks between the NOSE and the SCHNOS-O.

Methods: In a sample of 552 rhinoplasty patients who completed both instruments, the NOSE and SCHNOS-O scales were co-calibrated onto a common interval-scaled metric using Rasch analysis. Separate Rasch models were run per instrument, and the latent constructs were estimated using the calibrated item parameters. By anchoring original patient-reported outcome measure scores of both instruments to this Rasch computed measurement scale, the scores of both instruments were linked. A second independent sample was used to validate the created crosswalks.

Results: Total scores on the NOSE and SCHNOS-O were strongly correlated. The Rasch-based co-calibration of the NOSE and SCHNOS-O items resulted in a model that adequately fitted the data. Back-and-forth crosswalk tables were created from the NOSE to the SCHNOS-O. For patients with moderate nasal obstruction, predicted SCHNOS-O scores were slightly higher for a given level of the NOSE. Intraclass correlation coefficients between predicted and actual scores were 0.93 for both directions, indicating adequate agreement for group-level comparisons.

Conclusions: This study developed and validated Rasch-based crosswalks from the NOSE to the SCHNOS-O and vice versa. The provided crosswalks enhance comparison and harmonization of functional rhinoplasty outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512607PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011438DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nose schnos-o
20
crosswalks nose
12
nose
9
rasch analysis
8
validate crosswalks
8
functional subscale
8
nasal obstruction
8
patient-reported outcome
8
instruments linked
8
scores instruments
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!