Background: Immunological factors play a pivotal role in the outcomes of solid organ transplantation. We aimed to elucidate the effects of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and ABO compatibility on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 584 LDLT recipients from 2015 to 2020. The recipients were stratified into 3 groups: ABO-compatible recipients without DSAs (group 1), ABO-compatible recipients with DSAs (group 2), and ABO-incompatible recipients without DSAs (group 3). Propensity score matching was used for balanced comparisons.

Results: In the matched comparisons, group 2 exhibited a higher incidence of T cell-mediated rejection compared with group 1 (22.7% versus 4.5%, P  = 0.030). Despite this, the 5-y survival rates were similar between groups 1 and 2 (81.6% versus 95.5%, P  = 0.085). Group 3, in comparison with group 1, showed elevated rates of cytomegalovirus infection (23.2% versus 7.3%, P  = 0.008), T cell-mediated rejection (28.0% versus 7.3%, P  = 0.001), and antibody-mediated rejection (13.4% versus 0%, P  = 0.001). However, the survival rates were comparable between group 3 and group 1 (82.0% versus 86.5%, P  = 0.220, respectively). Comparisons between group 2 and group 3 did not reveal significant differences in postoperative outcomes or survival rates ( P  > 0.05).

Conclusions: DSA positivity and ABO incompatibility contribute to distinct posttransplant complications in LDLT. The integrated consideration of both factors in pretransplant assessment may enhance risk stratification and inform tailored interventions. Further research is required to corroborate these findings and provide mechanistic insights.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recipients dsas
12
dsas group
12
survival rates
12
group
11
donor-specific antibodies
8
abo incompatibility
8
living donor
8
donor liver
8
liver transplantation
8
abo-compatible recipients
8

Similar Publications

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) targeting mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules are one of the principal threats to long-term graft survival in solid organ transplantation. However, many patients with long-term circulating DSAs do not manifest rejection responses, suggesting a degree of heterogeneity in their pathogenicity and related functional activity. Immunologic risk stratification of transplant recipients is complicated by challenges intrinsic to defining alloantibody responses that are potentially pathogenic versus those that are not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current desensitization and maintenance immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation in sensitized individuals show limited ability to control the posttransplant humoral response, resulting in high rates of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure. Here, we showed that anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based immunosuppression more effectively controlled allograft rejection and humoral rebound in a highly sensitized nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model compared with tacrolimus-based standard-of-care (SOC) immunosuppression. Desensitization with an anti-CD154 mAb (5C8) and a proteasome inhibitor led to decreased donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and disruption of lymph node germinal centers with reduction of proliferating, memory, and class-switched B cells as well as T follicular helper cells.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Presensitized patients with circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) before transplantation are at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Peritransplant desensitization mitigates but does not eliminate the alloimmune response. We examined the possibility that subthreshold AMR activity undetected by histology could be operating in some early biopsies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Induction therapy is a critical component of renal transplantation, aimed at reducing delayed graft function (DGF) and improving graft survival. This review assesses the impact of leading large national and international guidelines: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), and European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) propositions, focusing on their applicability to high-risk groups, specifically, on Black patients and those with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). While NICE guidelines provide a standardized approach favoring basiliximab, concerns arise regarding their suitability for high-risk patients, who may benefit more from potent lymphocyte-depleting agents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Early-onset antibody-mediated rejection with fever as the main manifestation after bilateral lung transplantation: a case report].

Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi

December 2024

Department of Lung Transplantation, China-Japan Friendship Hospital; National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing100029, China.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients due to the presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs). Here, we reported that a 69-year-old woman with underlying connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) developed recurrent fever with elevated white blood cells, C-reactive protein (CRP) and new ground-glass opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) early after double lung transplantation. After a thorough investigation for infection, rejection and relapse of primary immune diseases, the patient was found to be panel-reactive antibody (PRA) positive and DSAs positive.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!