AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) affects knee stability and outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) in patients without prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
  • Researchers hypothesized that higher PTS would correlate with less knee laxity, fewer graft failures, and improved patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores.
  • Analysis of 37 knees showed no significant correlation between PTS and PRO scores, with 32.4% of knees experiencing positive posterior drawer tests, but the difference in PTS between those with and without positive tests was not statistically significant.

Article Abstract

Background: Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) leads to a relative anterior translation of the tibia on the femur. This is thought to decrease the stress on posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCLR) grafts.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of PTS on knee laxity, graft failure, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores after PCLR without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that patients with higher PTS would have less knee laxity, fewer graft failures, and better PROs compared with patients with lower PTS.

Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: All patients who underwent PCLR between 2001 and 2020 at a single institution were identified. Patients were excluded if they underwent concomitant or prior ACLR or proximal tibial osteotomy, were younger than 18 years, had <2 years of in-person clinical follow-up, and did not have documented PRO scores (Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score). Data were collected retrospectively from a prospectively gathered database. PTS measurements were recorded from perioperative lateral knee radiographs. A linear regression model was created to analyze PTS in relation to PRO scores. Patients with a grade 1 (1-5 mm) or higher posterior drawer were compared with those who had a negative posterior drawer.

Results: A total of 37 knees met inclusion criterion; the mean age was 30.7 years at the time of surgery. The mean clinical follow-up was 5.8 years. No significant correlation was found between either the Lysholm score or the IKDC score and the PTS. Twelve knees (32.4%) had a positive posterior drawer at final follow-up. The mean PTS in knees with a positive posterior drawer was 6.2°, whereas that for knees with a negative posterior drawer was 8.3° ( = .08). No significant differences in PRO scores were identified for knees with versus knees without a positive posterior drawer. No documented graft failures or revisions were found.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found in PROs or graft failure rates based on PTS at a mean of 5.8 years after PCLR. Increased tibial slope trended toward being protective against a positive posterior drawer, although this did not reach statistical significance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966978PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671241236804DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cruciate ligament
12
posterior tibial
8
tibial slope
8
posterior cruciate
8
ligament reconstruction
8
pts knee
8
knee laxity
8
posterior
4
slope outcomes
4
outcomes posterior
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!