Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: This in vitro study set out to find out how well oral cavity-dwelling bacteria can form biofilms and adhere on the surfaces of zirconium oxide samples created by 3D printing and milling technologies.
Methods: 5 strains of microorganisms were used for the study, and 40 zirconium oxide samples were prepared, which were divided into two groups ( = 20)-20 samples produced using removal technology comprised the control group, while 20 samples produced by 3D printing technology comprised the test group. The prepared samples were placed in culture media of bacteria and fungi that naturally occur in the oral cavity. Then, the intensity of biofilm build-up on the samples was determined using qualitative and quantitative methods. The results for both materials were compared with each other.
Results: No variations in the degree of biofilm deposition on zirconium oxide samples were found for the microorganisms , , , and . For fungi, more intense biofilm deposition was observed on samples made using 3D printing technology, but these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The biofilm accumulation intensity of ceramics produced by additive technology is comparable to that of milled zirconium oxide, which supports the material's broader use in clinical practice from a microbiological perspective. This ceramic has demonstrated its ability to compete with zirconium oxide produced by milling techniques in in vitro experiments, but sadly, no in vivo tests have yet been found to determine how this material will function in a patient's oral cavity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10972079 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17061231 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!