A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of Teosinte Flour () on Selected Physicochemical Characteristics and Consumer Perceptions of Gluten-Free Cocoa Cookies Formulated with Mung Bean () Flour. | LitMetric

, or teosinte, is a living fossil tree discovered in Olancho, Honduras, whose seeds have a desirable nutritional profile that can provide health benefits. As a result, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of teosinte flour obtained from seeds on selected physicochemical characteristics and consumer perceptions of gluten-free cocoa cookies formulated with mung bean () flour. Gluten-free cocoa cookies were prepared with different levels of teosinte flour (0%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% by weight of mung bean flour) in substitution of mung bean flour. The cookies were evaluated for texture hardness, color (L*, a*, b*), moisture content, and water activity. Sensory acceptability of appearance, color, texture, aroma, flavor, and overall quality of cocoa cookies was rated by 175 consumers using a "yes/no" binomial scale. Overall liking was evaluated using a 9-point hedonic scale. Purchase intent was evaluated with a "yes/no" binomial scale. The levels of teosinte flour did not significantly affect the acceptability of appearance, color, texture, flavor, aroma, and overall quality, and neither the overall liking nor the purchase intent responses. However, the texture attribute had the lowest % acceptability response among all sensory attributes. The addition of teosinte flour did not affect water activity and color (L*, a*, b*), whereas it decreased the texture hardness (g force), producing softer cookies. Cocoa cookies stayed acceptable even at 100% teosinte flour addition (70% acceptability; mean overall liking = 5.69). Teosinte flour has an excellent nutritional profile that could be practically applied in baked goods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10969276PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods13060910DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

teosinte flour
28
cocoa cookies
20
mung bean
16
bean flour
16
gluten-free cocoa
12
flour
11
effects teosinte
8
selected physicochemical
8
physicochemical characteristics
8
characteristics consumer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!