Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is rarely recommended for unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patient survival can improve with venetoclax plus azacitidine (VEN plus AZA). However, the long-term outcome of this treatment strategy is still unsatisfactory. The high response and low treatment toxicity rates of patients receiving VEN plus AZA can provide an opportunity for HSCT among unfit patients. Nevertheless, the outcomes and complications of VEN plus AZA, followed by HSCT, remain unclear.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving VEN plus AZA as induction therapy ( = 27) to those receiving the conventional I3A7 regimen as induction therapy ( = 34).

Result: The 1-year overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality rates in the two groups were similar. The cytogenetic risks and the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index are the most significant predictive factors of overall survival.

Conclusion: In older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, a low-intensity regimen with VEN plus AZA is a suitable bridge therapy. Furthermore, allo-HSCT is feasible and can be a curative option.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968407PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ven aza
20
unfit patients
12
venetoclax azacitidine
8
stem cell
8
cell transplantation
8
acute myeloid
8
myeloid leukemia
8
patients newly
8
newly diagnosed
8
receiving ven
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!