AI Article Synopsis

  • Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a common treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) but can cause unnecessary side effects; a new method called subtotal skin electron beam therapy (STSEBT) uses a shield to protect healthy skin.
  • A study reviewed 32 CTCL patients, with 7 receiving STSEBT and 25 receiving TSEBT, showing a median response rate of 96% and comparable effectiveness between the two methods after a follow-up of about 465 days.
  • The findings suggest that STSEBT offers similar treatment benefits while potentially reducing toxicity for CTCL patients with less severe disease compared to traditional TSEBT.

Article Abstract

Background/aim: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an effective treatment for managing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but may result in unnecessary toxicity. With the production of a custom rolling shield holding a configurable stack of plastic slats to block uninvolved skin, we implemented a program for subtotal skin electron beam therapy (STSEBT). We report our preliminary experience with STSEBT vs. TSEBT to manage CTCL.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective review of 32 CTCL patients who were treated at a single institution between February 28th, 2017, and May 25th, 2022, was completed. Of these cases, seven patients received STSEBT and 25 received TSEBT.

Results: Thirty-two patients underwent a course of STSEBT or TSEBT. The median follow-up was 465 days and the median age at diagnosis was 70.8 years. Stage distribution was as follows: one (3%) IA, 16 (50%) IB, 6 (19%) IIB, two (6%) IIIA, five (16%) IVA, and two (6%) IVB. The overall response rate was 96%. For patients receiving TSEBT (n=25), three (12%), 10 (40%), and 11 (44%) had a CR, NCR, and PR, respectively. For the patients receiving STSEBT, four (57.1%), three (42.9%), and zero (0%) had a CR, NCR, and PR, respectively. There was one patient (4%) with no response. Cumulative incidence of progressive skin disease requiring additional electron therapy at three months was 21.1% [IQR=8.6, 51.5%], 36.8% [IQR=20, 68%] at six months, and 57.9% [IQR=38.5, 87.1%] at one year. Low rates of toxicities were recorded.

Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that treatment of CTCL patients with low disease burden with STSEBT results in similar overall response and time to progression compared to treatment with TSEBT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16945DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin electron
12
subtotal skin
8
electron therapy
8
electron beam
8
beam therapy
8
stsebt tsebt
8
ctcl patients
8
patients receiving
8
patients
7
stsebt
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!