Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Rationale & Objective: β-Microglobulin (B2M) and β-trace protein (BTP) are novel endogenous filtration markers that may improve the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) beyond creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR), but they have not been assessed in patients with cancer.
Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis.
Setting & Participants: Prospective cohort of 1,200 patients with active solid tumors recruited between April 2015 and September 2017.
Exposure: CKD-EPI equations without race combining B2M and/or BTP with creatinine with or without cystatin C (2-, 3-, or 4-marker panel eGFR).
Outcome: Performance of equations compared with eGFR and non-GFR determinants of serum B2M and BTP (S, and S, respectively). Measured GFR (mGFR) was determined using the plasma clearance of chromium-51 labeled ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (Cr-EDTA).
Analytical Approach: Bias was defined as the median of the differences between mGFR and eGFR, and 1-P was defined as the percentage of estimates that differed by more than 30% from the mGFR (1-P). Linear regression was used to assess association of clinical and laboratory variables with S, and S after adjustment for mGFR.
Results: Mean age and mGFR were 58.8±13.2 SD years and 78.4±21.7 SD mL/min/1.73m, respectively. Performance of the 3-marker and 4-marker panel equations was better than eGFR (lesser bias and 1-P). Performance of 2-marker panel equations was as good as eGFR (lesser bias and similar 1-P). S and S were not strongly influenced by cancer site.
Limitations: Participants may have had better clinical performance status than the general population of patients with solid tumors.
Conclusions: B2M and BTP can improve the accuracy of eGFR and may be useful as confirmatory tests in patients with solid tumors, either by inclusion in a multimarker panel equation with creatinine and cystatin C, or by substituting for cystatin C in combination with creatinine.
Plain-language Summary: The most accurate method to assess estimate kidney function is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR). We studied whether using β2-microglobulin (B2M) and/or β-trace protein (BTP) with creatinine with or without cystatin C (2-, 3-, or 4-marker panel eGFR) might be useful in patients with active solid tumors. The performance of the 3-marker and 4-marker panel equations was better than eGFR. Performance of 2-marker panel equations was as good as eGFR. We conclude that B2M and BTP can improve the accuracy of eGFR and may be useful as a confirmatory test in patients with solid tumors either by inclusion in multimarker panel equation with creatinine and cystatin C or by substituting for cystatin C in combination with creatinine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.01.532 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!