Purpose Of Review: In this review, we will discuss the data from early clinical studies of MK-0616 and summarize clinical trials of other oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.
Recent Findings: The success of PCSK9 inhibition with monoclonal antibody injections has fueled the development of additional therapies targeting PCSK9, including oral formulations, the most advanced of which is MK-0616. MK-0616 is a novel, orally administered macrocyclic peptide that binds to PCSK9 and inhibits binding of PCSK9 to the LDL receptor, thereby decreasing plasma levels of LDL-C. Clinical trial data on the safety and efficacy of MK-0616 are promising and report LDL-C-lowering efficacy comparable to that provided by injectable PCSK9 inhibitors. Ongoing and future studies of oral PCSK9 inhibitors in development will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of these agents and their potential role in preventing cardiovascular disease events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01199-2 | DOI Listing |
Clin Investig Arterioscler
January 2025
Unidad de Lípidos y Riesgo Vascular, Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España. Electronic address:
Objective: To confirm the effectiveness and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in daily clinical practice.
Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients from hospital registry of PCSK9 inhibitor treatment with a follow-up ≥ 6 months. The lipid-lowering effect and safety were evaluated.
J Clin Med
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Northwell Health, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.
: Lipid disorders are very prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), leading to heightened cardiovascular risk. This review examines the effectiveness of lipid-lowering agents in these populations and explores gaps in the current research. The goal of this review is to assess the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies in CKD and ESRD patients and identify future research needs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
January 2025
Cardiovascular Department, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
This study assessed the proportion of secondary cardiovascular prevention patients who achieved low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets as per the 2019 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines. We also evaluated whether lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) were adjusted in patients not meeting targets and analyzed the likelihood of these modifications achieving recommended levels. A multicenter, cross-sectional observational study retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1909 outpatients in 9 Italian cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention clinics from January 2023 to June 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
January 2025
Department of vascular surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1 Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330006.
Objective: To assess the impact of lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) and antihypertensive drugs on the risk of aortic diseases.
Methods: Mendelian randomization was utilized to analyze data from 500,000 participants in the UK Biobank to evaluate the effects of statins, PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers on the risks of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and aortic dissection (AD) using genetic variants as proxies. Real-world pharmacovigilance data from the FAERS database was used.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
January 2025
Division of Cardiology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Aims: Considering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods And Results: We retrospectively analyzed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N=198, January-June 2019), when the LDL-C goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N=180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N=122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and one-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!