A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Review of the Distribution and Health Effect of Organophosphorus Flame Retardants in Indoor Environments. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) are being used as substitutes for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and have been found in various indoor environments globally.
  • - A study analyzed 11 types of OPFRs in 33 indoor dust samples and 10 air samples, revealing higher concentrations of TBOEP, TCIPP, and TDCIPP in indoor dust due to their properties.
  • - Although general exposure levels for adults and toddlers were usually below established safety thresholds, specific pathways indicate that toddlers in Japan could experience significant exposure to TBOEP through ingestion.

Article Abstract

As a replacement for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been widely used and detected in different indoor environments all over the world. This paper comprehensively describes the concentration levels and distribution information of 11 kinds of OPFRs from 33 indoor dust and 10 air environments, from which TBOEP, TCIPP, and TDCIPP were observed to have higher concentrations in indoor environments. The ΣOPFRs displayed higher concentrations in indoor dust than in indoor air due to the higher molecular weight and vapor pressure of ΣOPFRs in building decoration materials, specifically for TCIPP and TDCIPP compounds. Considering that it is inevitable that people will be exposed to these chemicals in the indoor environments in which they work and live, we estimated their potential health risks through three human exposure pathways and found that the ingestion exposure to TBOEP for toddlers in Japan may reach up to 1270.80 ng/kg/day, which comprises a significant pathway compared to dermal contact and indoor air inhalation. Specifically, the combined total exposure to OPFRs by air inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal contact was generally below the RfD values for both adults and toddlers, with a few notable higher exposures of some typical OPFRs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10974006PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics12030195DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

indoor environments
16
organophosphorus flame
8
flame retardants
8
indoor
8
indoor dust
8
tcipp tdcipp
8
higher concentrations
8
concentrations indoor
8
indoor air
8
dermal contact
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!