Associations of Regional Body Fat with Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, and State Key Laboratory of Environment Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Published: March 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate how different regions of body fat relate to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), a group that typically faces higher CVD risks due to changes in fat distribution.
  • Involving 21,472 participants from the UK Biobank, researchers measured body fat using bioelectric impedance and analyzed data over a median of 7.7 years. They found that higher arm and trunk fat increased CVD risk, while higher leg fat actually decreased it.
  • The results suggest that not only the amount of body fat but also its location is crucial for assessing CVD and mortality risks in those with T2D.

Article Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to prospectively examine the association between regional body fat and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who often exhibit changes in relative fat distribution and have increased CVD risk.

Methods: The main analysis included 21,472 participants with T2D from the UK Biobank. Regional body fat was measured by bioelectric impedance assessment. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Over a median of 7.7 years of follow-up, 3,976 CVD events occurred. After multivariable adjustment, upper and lower body fat were independently and oppositely associated with CVD risk among patients with T2D. Higher arm fat percentage was linearly associated with increased CVD risk (P nonlinear >0.05), while higher trunk fat percentage was nonlinearly associated with increased CVD risk (P nonlinear <0.05). In contrast, higher leg fat percentage was nonlinearly associated with lower CVD risk (P nonlinear <0.05). When comparing extreme quartiles, the multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) of CVD was 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) for leg fat percentage, 1.63 (1.29, 2.05) for arm fat percentage, and 1.27 (1.06, 1.52) for trunk fat percentage. Similar patterns of associations were observed for all-cause and CVD mortality. In addition, leg fat percentage, but not other regional fat percentage, was associated with CVD risk independently of traditional measures of obesity.

Conclusions: Among people with T2D, arm fat and trunk fat were positively, whereas leg fat was inversely, associated with the risk of CVD and mortality. These findings highlight the importance of considering both the amount and the location of body fat when assessing CVD and mortality risk among individuals with T2D.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae192DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body fat
16
regional body
12
increased cvd
12
cvd risk
12
fat risk
8
risk cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular disease
8
individuals type
8
type diabetes
8
fat percentage
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!