AI Article Synopsis

  • Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) show potential for improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest response times and CPR quality, with research conducted through timed simulations involving CPR and AED delivery.
  • The study involved 51 participants and found that the median time from a 9-1-1 call to starting CPR was 1 minute and 19 seconds, while retrieving and using the drone-delivered AED took just under 2 minutes.
  • Results indicated that younger participants and those with previous AED experience performed AED tasks faster, but recent CPR training did not significantly influence the quality of CPR or the AED delivery time.

Article Abstract

Background: Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) hold promises in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our objective was to estimate the time needed to perform resuscitation with a drone-delivered AED and to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality.

Methods: Mock out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations that included a 9-1-1 call, CPR, and drone-delivered AED were conducted. Each simulation was timed and video-recorded. CPR performance metrics were recorded by a Laerdal Resusci Anne Quality Feedback System. Multivariable regression modeling examined factors associated with time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock and CPR quality metrics (compression rate, depth, recoil, and chest compression fraction). Comparisons were made among those with recent CPR training (≤2 years) versus no recent (>2 years) or prior CPR training.

Results: We recruited 51 research participants between September 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 34 (Q1-Q3, 23-54) years, 56.9% were female, and 41.2% had recent CPR training. The median time from 9-1-1 call to initiation of CPR was 1:19 (Q1-Q3, 1:06-1:26) minutes. A median time of 1:59 (Q1-Q3, 01:50-02:20) minutes was needed to retrieve a drone-delivered AED and deliver a shock. The median CPR compression rate was 115 (Q1-Q3, 109-124) beats per minute, the correct compression depth percentage was 92% (Q1-Q3, 25-98), and the chest compression fraction was 46.7% (Q1-Q3, 39.9%-50.6%). Recent CPR training was not associated with CPR quality or time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Younger age (per 10-year increase; β, 9.97 [95% CI, 4.63-15.31] s; <0.001) and prior experience with AED (β, -30.0 [95% CI, -50.1 to -10.0] s; =0.004) were associated with more rapid time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Prior AED use (β, 6.71 [95% CI, 1.62-11.79]; =0.011) was associated with improved chest compression fraction percentage.

Conclusion: Research participants were able to rapidly retrieve an AED from a drone while largely maintaining CPR quality according to American Heart Association guidelines. Chest compression fraction was lower than expected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127748PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010061DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

9-1-1 call
16
cpr
12
drone-delivered aed
12
time 9-1-1
12
cpr training
12
time needed
8
cpr performance
8
out-of-hospital cardiac
8
cardiac arrest
8
call aed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!