AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the accuracy of the new μQFR method in estimating blood flow reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing valve replacement, focusing on their coronary artery disease (CAD) status.
  • Results showed that pre-TAVR μQFR correlated strongly with post-TAVR fractional flow reserve (FFR), indicating its potential as a diagnostic tool for ischemia.
  • Overall, μQFR demonstrated high accuracy and comparable performance to existing methods, suggesting it could enhance the assessment of patients with severe AS and CAD.

Article Abstract

Background: Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) is a novel computational method that enables accurate estimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) using a single angiographic projection. However, its diagnostic value in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear.

Method: We included 25 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe AS with intermediate or greater (30-90%) coronary artery disease (CAD). Pre- and post-TAVR μQFR, QFR, instantaneous flow reserve (iFR), and post-TAVR invasive FFR values were measured. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of pre-TAVR μQFR, QFR, and iFR using post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.80 as a reference standard of ischemia.

Result: Pre-TAVR μQFR was significantly correlated with post-TAVR FFR (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001). The area under the curve of pre-TAVR μQFR on post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.8 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.98), comparable to that of pre-TAVR iFR (0.86 [95% CI 0.71-0.98], p = 0.97). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of pre-TAVR μQFR on post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.8 were 84.2% (95% CI 68.7-93.4), 61.6% (95% CI 31.6-86.1), 96.0% (95% CI 79.6-99.9), 88.9% (95% CI 52.9-98.3), and 82.8% (95% CI 70.6-90.6), respectively. For pre-TAVR iFR, these values were 76.5% (95% CI 58.8-89.3), 90.9% (95% CI 58.7-99.8), 69.6% (95% CI 47.1-86.8), 58.8% (95% CI 42.8-73.1), and 94.1% (95% CI 70.8-99.1), respectively.

Conclusion: μQFR could be useful for the physiological evaluation of patients with severe AS with concomitant CAD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02387-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

murray law-based
8
law-based quantitative
8
quantitative flow
8
flow ratio
8
patients severe
8
severe aortic
8
aortic stenosis
8
transcatheter aortic
8
aortic valve
8
valve replacement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!