Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: A structured Attitude Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) module for undergraduates exists. For ensuring that the module achieves what it is intended to achieve, there was a felt need to develop a learning portfolio with an emphasis on reflections and with a scope for assessment.
Methods: The AETCOM module by NMC has laid out objectives, lesson plans, and case-based scenarios. Hybrid portfolio development was necessary to align the sessions to the objectives and lesson plans and to help students capture their learning process with self-reflection, and at the same time, ensure the scope of assessment of these activities. Hence, writing reflections was considered the most important step. Measures were taken to train students in writing reflections, and faculty development workshops were also conducted. An evaluation was done using Kirkpatrick model level I-III using student's feedback form, scores of rubric matrix for assessment of reflections and one-on-one interaction with students by trained faculty. Faculty perspectives on portfolio development were collected.
Results: A significant improvement in students' self-assessment scores on AETCOM module was seen (p <0.05). An assessment of reflections using a rubric matrix showed that all the students reached at least grade B by the end of three months. More than 90% of faculty members felt that the faculty is vital for assessing AETCOM.
Conclusion: The development of a hybrid portfolio for AETCOM requires faculty development and special sessions for students on writing reflections. The hybrid portfolio provides the learner to self reflect, and a rubric matrix can be used to assess reflections.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954497 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.04.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!