Using expressive writing to improve cancer caregiver and patient health: A randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Eur J Oncol Nurs

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Building 420, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States. Electronic address:

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluated whether Expressive Writing (EW) could help improve the health of informal cancer caregivers (ICs) and patients while also enhancing the caregivers' ability to regulate their emotions.
  • A total of 58 breast cancer ICs and patients participated in a randomized trial where ICs engaged in EW sessions, assessing their health and emotional regulation at various points.
  • Results indicated that while EW showed small to medium positive effects on caregiver and patient health, as well as modest improvements in emotional regulation, further strategies are needed to maintain participant involvement and ensure thorough testing.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Expressive Writing (EW) in improving informal cancer caregiver (IC) and patient health, and enhancing ICs' emotion regulation.

Method: Fifty-eight breast cancer ICs and patients participated in a randomized controlled feasibility trial of remote EW. ICs were randomly assigned to the EW or control group and completed 3 weekly writing sessions. ICs and patients completed health and emotion regulation assessments at baseline, intervention completion, and 3 months post-intervention. Screening, recruitment, assessment process, randomization, retention, treatment adherence, and treatment fidelity were computed for feasibility. Effect sizes were calculated using the PROMIS Depression Short Form, RAND Short Form 36 Health Survey, Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Hormonal Symptom checklist, healthcare utilization, and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for efficacy.

Results: Of the 232 interested individuals, 82 were screened, and 60 enrolled (6 monthly). Two individuals withdrew and 19 were lost to follow-up, leaving 39 individuals. ICs completed at least one assessment and two sessions, and patients completed at least two assessments. All sessions were administered as intended. ICs generally followed instructions (88%-100%), wrote the full time (66.7%-100%), and were engaged (M(SD) = 3.00(1.29)-4.00(0.00)). EW had small-to-medium effects in improving IC health (g = -0.27-0.04) and small-to-large effects in improving patient health (g = -0.28-0.86). EW moderately decreased suppression (g = 0.53-0.54) and slightly increased reappraisal, at least 3 months post-intervention (g = -0.34-0.20).

Conclusions: Remote EW may be feasible with cancer ICs and improve cancer IC and patient health. However, it can benefit from additional retention strategies and rigorous testing.

Trial Registration: CenterWatch Clinical Trials Listing Service (#TX217874); ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT06123416).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102578DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient health
16
expressive writing
8
improve cancer
8
cancer caregiver
8
caregiver patient
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled feasibility
8
feasibility trial
8
breast cancer
8
cancer ics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!