Evaluation of Aortic Hemodynamics Using Four-Dimensional Flow of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rabbits with Liver Fibrosis.

Background: Liver fibrosis (LF) precipitates systemic hemodynamic alterations, however, its impact on the aorta remaining undefined.

Purpose: To assess aorta hemodynamics changes during LF development in a rabbit model.

Study Type: Prospective, experimental.

Animal Model: Thirty 7-month-old male rabbits underwent bile duct ligation (BDL) to induce LF.

Field Strength/sequence: Biweekly four-dimensional (4D) flow imaging incorporating a 3D gradient-echo at 3.0 T scanner for 14 weeks post-BDL.

Assessment: Histopathological exams for 2-5 rabbits were performed at each time point, following each MRI scan. LF was graded using the Metavir scale by a pathologist. 4D flow was analyzed by two radiologists using dedicated postprocessing software. They recorded 4D flow parameters at four aorta sections (aortic sinus, before and after bifurcation of aortic arch, and descending aorta).

Statistical Tests: The linear mixed model; Bonferroni correction; Pearson correlation coefficient (r); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; Delong test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Following BDL, the wall shear stress (WSS) (0.23-0.32 Pa), energy loss (EL) (0.27-1.55 mW) of aorta significantly increased at the second week for each plane, peaking at the sixth week (WSS: 0.35-0.49 Pa, EL: 0.57-2.0 mW). So did the relative pressure difference (RPD) (second week: 1.67 ± 1.63 mmHg, sixth week: 2.43 ± 0.63 mmHg) in plane 2. Notably, the RPD in plane 2 at the second week displayed the highest area under ROC curve of 0.998 (specificity: 1, sensitivity: 0.967). LF were found at the second, fourth, and sixth week after BDL, with grade F2, F3, and F4, respectively. The RPD in plane 2 was most strongly correlated with the severity of LF (r = 0.86).

Data Conclusions: The occurrence of LF could increase WSS, EL, and RPD of aorta as early as the second week following BDL.

Level Of Evidence: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.