Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00551-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abortion bans
4
bans pre-empt
4
pre-empt duty
4
duty provide
4
provide life-saving
4
life-saving abortion
4
abortion care
4
care pregnant
4
pregnant patients
4
patients medical
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Since Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) removed federal abortion protections, people's views about alternative models of abortion care may have been impacted, yet research on this topic is limited.

Objective: To examine changes in national support for and personal interest in advance provision (AP) and over-the-counter (OTC) access to medication abortion.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Two nationally representative cross-sectional online surveys were administered to a market research firm's panel members who were assigned female at birth (AFAB) and aged 15 to 49 years from December 2021 to January 2022 (before Dobbs) and June to July 2023 (after Dobbs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Navigating "regulatory fog": Challenges to rigorous abortion research after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Contraception

January 2025

Collaborative for Reproductive Equity, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1300 University Avenue, Medical Sciences Center 4245 Madison, WI 53706 USA. Electronic address:

In 2022, the United States' Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade and federal protections for abortion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We explored awareness of and attitudes about the safety of various methods people use to attempt to end a pregnancy without medical assistance, which we refer to in this study collectively as self-managed abortion (SMA).

Methods: In 2020, we invited individuals living in eight United States (US) states considered "hostile" to abortion rights or with a history of criminalizing abortions performed outside the formal healthcare system to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews regarding their attitudes toward these practices. We analyzed coded transcripts for content and themes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adolescents' political and personal responses to recent policies restricting abortion and gender-affirming care.

Contracept X

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Compex Family Planning, Ci3 at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Objectives: Restrictive policies on abortion and gender-affirming care have increased in recent years, particularly in some Midwest states, and can have a disproportionate impact on young people. We sought to explore adolescent perspectives on such policies.

Study Design: We conducted virtual semistructured interviews with 39 participants aged 16 to 19 residing in the Midwest between April and June 2023, exploring participant reactions to state policies on abortion and gender-affirming care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: By allowing for abortion bans and restrictions to take effect in the majority of US states, the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision portends to have lasting impacts on patient care and the physician workforce. Notably, it is already beginning to impact practice location preferences of US health care workers, evidenced by declining application rates to residency programs in abortion-restrictive states since 2022. Yet, there remains a gap in the literature regarding why this trend exists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!