AI Article Synopsis

  • * Two experiments compared the CFP of growing-finishing pigs of various sexes raised under different conditions, revealing that heavier pigs consistently had a higher CFP relative to their carcass growth and weight.
  • * A soy-free feed in the final phase showed that high slaughter weights can lead to lower sustainability unless low-CFP feed is used, indicating that feed choices play a vital role in mitigating environmental impact.

Article Abstract

The impact of pork production on global livestock's greenhouse gas emissions is substantial. Understanding the factors influencing these emissions is crucial in achieving a more sustainable pig husbandry. In two independent experiments, the impact of slaughter weight on the carbon footprint (CFP) of pig feed intake (CFP) was evaluated for growing-finishing pigs of different sexes (entire males (EM), barrows (BA), immunocastrates (IC) and gilts (GI)). In experiment 1 118 animals were raised individually in experimental conditions. In experiment 2 384 animals were housed in group (four pigs per pen), in controlled commercial farm circumstances. All animals were fed ad libitum in a three-phase feeding regime and slaughtered at different BW, ranging from 110 to 148 kg (experiment 1) and from 99 to 138 kg (experiment 2). When only the fattening period was considered, the CFP was expressed per kg carcass growth. When the production of piglets was also taken into account, the CFP was calculated per kg carcass weight. For all sexes, the heavier the pig, the higher the CFP per kg carcass growth (P < 0.05, experiment 1; P < 0.001, experiment 2) and per kg carcass weight (P < 0.05, experiment 1; P < 0.01, experiment 2). In addition, BA had a significantly higher CFP per kg carcass growth and per kg carcass weight compared to EM and IC and to EM, IC and GI in respectively experiments 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). When performing a desk study with a soy-free (i.e. reduced CFP) feed in the third phase of experiment 2, slaughter weight no longer affected the CFP per kg carcass growth (P = 0.133) and per kg carcass weight (P = 0.856). A higher slaughter weight thus implies a lower sustainability, unless a sufficiently low-CFP feed is provided in the finisher phase.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101119DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impact slaughter
8
slaughter weight
8
carbon footprint
8
pig feed
8
feed intake
8
carcass growth
8
cfp
5
weight sex
4
sex carbon
4
pig
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!