Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) provide a powerful statistical and psychometric tool for researchers and practitioners to learn fine-grained diagnostic information about respondents' latent attributes. There has been a growing interest in the use of CDMs for polytomous response data, as more and more items with multiple response options become widely used. Similar to many latent variable models, the identifiability of CDMs is critical for accurate parameter estimation and valid statistical inference. However, the existing identifiability results are primarily focused on binary response models and have not adequately addressed the identifiability of CDMs with polytomous responses. This paper addresses this gap by presenting sufficient and necessary conditions for the identifiability of the widely used DINA model with polytomous responses, with the aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the identifiability of CDMs with polytomous responses and to inform future research in this field.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09961-w | DOI Listing |
Entropy (Basel)
December 2024
Ph.D. Program in Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Heywood cases and other improper solutions occur frequently in latent variable models, e.g., factor analysis, item response theory, latent class analysis, multilevel models, or structural equation models, all of which are models with response variables taken from an exponential family.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Ophthalmol (Lausanne)
November 2024
Department of Specialty, Advanced Care and Vision Science, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, United States.
Qual Life Res
December 2024
Clinical Outcome Assessment Program, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Purpose: Item response theory (IRT) models are an increasingly popular method choice for evaluating clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for use in clinical trials. Given common constraints in clinical trial design, such as limits on sample size and assessment lengths, the current study aimed to examine the appropriateness of commonly used polytomous IRT models, specifically the graded response model (GRM) and partial credit model (PCM), in the context of how they are frequently used for psychometric evaluation of COAs in clinical trials.
Methods: Data were simulated under varying sample sizes, measure lengths, response category numbers, and slope strengths, as well as under conditions that violated some model assumptions, namely, unidimensionality and equality of item slopes.
We outline a procedure for examining collapsibility over site in multiple-location settings that are frequently utilized in contemporary educational and behavioral research. The method is based on a test of cross-site identity of the response distributions of polytomous items in multi-component measuring instruments, which implies the possibility to pool over study location. The approach is readily applicable in empirical studies using popular and widely circulated software and is generalizable to various types of items.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEduc Psychol Meas
June 2024
Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
A procedure is outlined for point and interval estimation of location parameters associated with polytomous items, or raters assessing studied subjects or cases, which follow the rating scale model. The method is developed within the framework of latent variable modeling, and is readily applied in empirical research using popular software. The approach permits testing the goodness of fit of this widely used model, which represents a rather parsimonious item response theory model as a means of description and explanation of an analyzed data set.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!