[RECOMA study: Evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction after immediate or delayed breast reconstruction].

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol

Département de chirurgie gynécologie et obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire Jean-Minjoz, université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; Unité de recherche Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery & Therapeutics EA4662, université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 16, route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France.

Published: September 2024

Objective: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy, whether immediate or delayed, is an integral part of the overall management of breast cancer. However, up to 40 % of reconstructed patients are not satisfied with the aesthetic result. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate satisfaction and quality of life according to the reconstruction techniques used in our center. The secondary objectives were to identify the parameters that could influence satisfaction and quality of life after surgery, to list the main complications, and the number of operations required to consider the reconstruction process as completed.

Method: A retrospective monocentric study, RECOMA, was carried out at the CHRU Minjoz in Besançon. All patients who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2021 were contacted by post or e-mail and asked to complete the standardized BREAST-Q postoperative module.

Results: Of 508 patients contacted, 149 were included. Reconstructed patients reported satisfaction, but also "average" quality of physical and psychological sexual life. Only the surgeon's assessment was rated as "good". There was no significant difference in satisfaction and quality of life depending on the reconstruction method chosen. On the other hand, patients who underwent nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction had a significantly higher psychic quality of life score (P=0.02). In addition, a significant decrease in physical satisfaction was observed over time(P=0.049). An average of 2.4 operations was required to consider breast reconstruction complete.

Conclusion: In our opinion, breast reconstruction is an essential procedure to be considered as soon as the indication for mastectomy is given, but it is a process that requires the patient to be prepared for a result that may be weaker than expected, may require several operations, and may be complicated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality life
20
breast reconstruction
16
satisfaction quality
12
delayed breast
8
reconstruction
8
reconstructed patients
8
required consider
8
patients underwent
8
quality
6
life
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!