AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates variations in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse widths among different pulse sources and stimulation intensities, revealing significant differences in average pulse widths compared to manufacturer specifications.
  • - Seven MagVenture® pulse sources were tested, with results showing a mean pulse width of 288.11s, deviating slightly from the expected 280s value; however, variability was low within groups.
  • - A pilot experiment indicated no significant impact of pulse width on motor evoked potential amplitude but showed differences in latencies, suggesting further research is needed to explore the physiological implications of varied pulse lengths and other factors like hardware aging.

Article Abstract

There is a high variability in the physiological effects of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation, resulting in limited generalizability of measurements. The cause of the variability is assumed to be primarily based on differences in brain function and structure of the stimulated individuals, while the variability of the physical properties of the magnetic stimulus has so far been largely neglected. Thus, this study is dedicated to the systematic investigation of variability in the pulse width of different TMS pulse sources at different stimulation intensities.The pulse widths of seven MagVenture® pulse sources were measured at the output of 10%-100% stimulation intensity in 10% increments via Near Field Probe and oscilloscope. The same C-B60 coil was used to deliver biphasic pulses. Pulse widths were compared between pulse sources and stimulation intensities.The mean sample pulse width was 288.11 ± 0.37s, which deviates from the value of 280s specified by the manufacturer. The pulse sources and stimulation intensities differ in their average pulse width (< .001). However, the coefficient of variation within the groups (pulse source; stimulation intensity) were moderately low (CV = 0.13%-0.67%).The technical parameter of pulse width shows deviations from the proposed manufacturer value. According to our data, within a pulse source of the same manufacturer, the pulse width variability is minimal, but varies between pulse sources of the same and other pulse source models. Whether the observed variability in pulse width has potential physiological relevance was tested in a pilot experiment on a single healthy subject, showing no significant difference in motor evoked potential amplitude and significant difference in latencies. Future research should systematically investigate the physiological effects of different pulse lengths. Furthermore, potential hardware ageing effects and pulse amplitude should be investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad367aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulse width
28
pulse sources
20
pulse
18
variability pulse
12
sources stimulation
12
pulse source
12
transcranial magnetic
8
physiological effects
8
stimulation intensitiesthe
8
pulse widths
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!