Background: There is limited data regarding how clinicians operationalize shared decision-making (SDM) with athletes with cardiovascular diagnoses. This study was designed to explore sports cardiologists' conceptions of SDM and approaches to sports eligibility decisions.

Methods: 20 sports cardiologists were interviewed by telephone or video conference from October 2022 to May 2023. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted with the transcripts.

Results: All participants endorsed SDM for eligibility decisions, however, SDM was defined and operationalized heterogeneously. Only 6 participants specifically referenced eliciting patient preferences during SDM. Participants described variable roles for the physician in SDM and variable views on athletes' understanding, perception, and tolerance of risk. Participants thresholds for prohibitive annual risk of sudden cardiac death ranged from <1 % to >10 %.

Conclusions: These findings reinforce the general acceptance of SDM for sports eligibility decisions and highlight the need to better understand this process and identify the most effective approach for operationalization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946034PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100371DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sports eligibility
12
eligibility decisions
12
shared decision-making
8
sdm
7
sports
5
physicians approach
4
approach shared
4
decision-making sports
4
eligibility
4
decisions heterogeneously
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!