AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess QuickSee's effectiveness in identifying children aged 4-12 at risk for major vision issues such as refractive error, amblyopia, and strabismus.* -
  • QuickSee demonstrated high accuracy with an AUC of ≥0.92 for refractive errors, achieving sensitivity and specificity rates of 84.2% and 87.3% for detecting any refractive error, and 81.1% and 87.9% for any significant vision condition.* -
  • Results indicated that adding unaided near visual acuity did not significantly enhance QuickSee's ability to detect hyperopia, and the overall testability of QuickSee was 94.3% in the evaluated population.*

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the ability of QuickSee to detect children at risk for significant vision conditions (significant refractive error [RE], amblyopia and strabismus).

Methods: Non-cycloplegic refraction (using QuickSee without and with +2 dioptre (D) fogging lenses) and unaided binocular near visual acuity (VA) were measured in 4- to 12-year-old children. Eye examination findings (VA, cover testing and cycloplegic retinoscopy) were used to determine the presence of vision conditions. QuickSee performance was summarised by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity for various levels of RE. QuickSee referral criteria for each vision condition were chosen to maximise sensitivity at a specificity of approximately 85%-90%. Sensitivity and specificity to detect vision conditions were calculated using multiple criteria. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the benefit of adding near VA (6/12 or worse) for detecting hyperopia. A paired t-test compared QuickSee without and with fogging lenses.

Results: The mean age was 8.2 (±2.5) years (n = 174). RE ranged up to 9.25 D myopia, 8 D hyperopia, 5.25 D astigmatism and 3.5 D anisometropia. The testability of the QuickSee was 94.3%. AUC was ≥0.92 (excellent) for each level of RE. For the detection of any RE, sensitivity and specificity were 84.2% and 87.3%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 94.5% and 78.2%, respectively, using the American Academy for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) guidelines. For the detection of any significant vision condition, the sensitivity and specificity of QuickSee were 81.1% and 87.9%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 93% and 78.6%, respectively, using AAPOS criteria. There was no significant benefit of adding near VA to QuickSee for the detection of hyperopia ≥+2.00 (p = 0.34). There was no significant difference between QuickSee measurements of hyperopic refractive error with and without fogging lenses (difference = -0.09 D; p = 0.51).

Conclusions: QuickSee had high discriminatory power for detecting children with hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, anisometropia, any significant refractive error or any significant vision condition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13301DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensitivity specificity
20
vision conditions
16
refractive error
12
vision condition
12
quicksee
11
detection vision
8
fogging lenses
8
benefit adding
8
modified orinda
8
orinda criteria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!