A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Unexpected Tc-pertechnetate avidity of lymph node metastases predicts better response to radioiodine therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with lymph node metastases. | LitMetric

Objective: To investigate the value of Tc-pertechnetate scan in postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients with lymph node (LN) metastases (LNM) uptake Tc-pertechnetate, especially the predictive value to their response to radioiodine-131 (I) therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study collected 752 patients with DTC and LNM treated at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between May 2012 and December 2017. Depending on the ability of LNM uptake Tc-pertechnetate, the patients were grouped as the Tc-pertechnetate-avid (n=88) vs. Tc-pertechnetate-non-avid (n=664) groups. And Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a 1:4 ratio to reduce confounding bias.

Results: In the PSM analysis, the 1:4 matched cohort comprised 752 patients (88 with Tc-pertechnetate-avid LNM, 664 with Tc-pertechnetate-non-avid LNM). Patients' age, initial I activity and frequency of iodine therapy were included as covariates. After PSM analysis, 363 patients (Tc-pertechnetate-avid group, n=83; Tc-pertechnetate-non-avid group, n=280) were successfully matched. Among the 363 PSM-matched patients, 48/83 (57.8%) in the Tc-pertechnetate-avid group and 158/280 (56.4%) in the Tc-pertechnetate-non-avid group had two or more I treatments. The nsTg and the percentage of changes in ssTg between the Tc-pertechnetate-avid and Tc-pertechnetate-non-avid groups were significantly different ([0.05 (0.04 to 0.90) vs. 0.40 (0.04 to 4.92), =0.018] and [-88% (-98%, -50%) vs. -66% (-86%, -30%), < 0.001], respectively). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the other parameters (age, pathological type, distant metastasis, follow-up time, AJCC TNM stage, initial I treatment activity, and I treatment frequency) after PSM (all > 0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with DTC and LNM, LNM uptake of Tc-pertechnetate is a rare phenomenon. Patients with Tc-pertechnetate-avid LNMs were more likely to benefit from I therapy, even after adjustment for age, I treatment frequency, and initial I activity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944372PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/PBCV5827DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lymph node
12
node metastases
12
lnm uptake
12
uptake tc-pertechnetate
12
patients tc-pertechnetate-avid
12
patients
9
differentiated thyroid
8
thyroid cancer
8
patients lymph
8
752 patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!