AI Article Synopsis

  • - The advancements in treating abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 15 years have led to the need for a reassessment of the quality assurance guidelines for nursing personnel training in intensive care in Germany, which currently mandates a 50% specialist training quota that lacks empirical backing.
  • - A diverse group of 37 experts participated in a modified Delphi process involving literature searches, surveys, and discussions to assess and redefine training quotas for nursing staff, ultimately reaching a consensus.
  • - The expert panel recommended lowering the required specialist training quota to 30% and emphasized the need for structured programs to maintain and elevate nursing staff qualifications in intensive care units managing abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The medical development in the previous 15 years and the changes in treatment reality of the comprehensive elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms necessitate a re-evaluation of the quality assurance guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (QBAA-RL). In the current version this requires a specialist further training quota for nursing personnel in intensive care wards of 50%. The quota was determined in 2008 based on expert opinions, although a direct empirical evidence base for this does not exist.

Methods: Representatives from the fields of patient representation, physicians, nursing personnel and other relevant interface areas were invited to participate in a modified Delphi procedure. Following a comprehensive narrative literature search, a survey and focus group discussions with national and international experts, a total of three anonymized online-based voting rounds were carried out for which previously determined key statements were assessed with a 4‑point Likert scale (totally disagree up to totally agree). In addition, the expert panel had also defined a recommendation for a minimum quota for the specialist training of nursing personnel on intensive care wards in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, whereby an a priori agreement of 80% of the participants was defined as the consensus limit.

Results: Overall, 37 experts participated in the discussions and three successive voting rounds (participation rate 89%). The panel confirmed the necessity of a re-evaluation of the guideline recommendations and recommended the introduction of a shift-related minimum quota of 30% of the full-time equivalent of nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the introduction of structured promotional programs for long-term elevation of the quota.

Conclusion: In this national Delphi procedure with medical and nursing experts as well as representatives of patients, the fundamental benefits and needs of professional specialist qualifications in the field of intensive care medicine were confirmed. The corresponding minimum quota for specialist further training of intensive care nursing personnel should generally apply without limitations to specific groups. The expert panel stipulates a shift-related minimum quota for intensive care nursing personnel with specialist training of 30% of the nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the obligatory introduction of structured and transparent promotion programs for the long-term enhancement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11031449PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02066-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nursing personnel
32
intensive care
32
specialist training
20
personnel intensive
20
care wards
16
minimum quota
16
treatment abdominal
12
abdominal aortic
12
aortic aneurysms
12
delphi procedure
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!