A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Qualitative and quantitative image quality of coronary CT angiography using photon-counting computed tomography: Standard and Ultra-high resolution protocols. | LitMetric

Purpose: We aimed to identify the optimal reconstruction settings based on qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters on standard and ultra-high resolution (UHR) images using photon-counting CT (PCCT).

Method: We analysed 45 patients, 29 with standard and 16 with UHR acquisition, applying both smoother and sharper kernel settings. Coronary CT angiography images were performed on a dual-source PCCT system using standard (0.4/0.6 mm slice thickness, Bv40/Bv44 kernels, QIR levels 0-4) or UHR acquisition (0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, Bv44/Bv56 kernels, QIR levels 0-4). Qualitative image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale. Image noise (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in both the proximal and distal segments.

Results: On standard resolution, larger slice thickness resulted in an average increase of 12.5 % in CNR, whereas sharper kernel led to an average 8.7 % decrease in CNR. Highest CNR was measured on 0.6 mm, Bv40, QIR4 images and lowest on 0.4 mm, Bv44, QIR0 images: 25.8 ± 4.1vs.8.3 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001). On UHR images, highest CNR was observed on 0.4 mm, Bv40, QIR4 and lowest on 0.2 mm, Bv56 and QIR0 images: 21.5 ± 3.9vs.3.6 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001). Highest qualitative image quality was found on images with Bv44 kernel and QIR level 3/4 with both slice thicknesses on standard reconstruction. Additionally, Bv56 with QIR4 on 0.2 mm slice thickness images showed highest subjective image quality. Preserved distal vessel visualization was detected using QIR 2-4, Bv56 and 0.2 mm slice thickness.

Conclusions: Photon-counting CT demonstrated high qualitative and quantitative image quality for the assessment of coronaries and stents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
12
slice thickness
12
qualitative quantitative
8
quantitative image
8
coronary angiography
8
standard ultra-high
8
ultra-high resolution
8
uhr acquisition
8
sharper kernel
8
kernels qir
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!