A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The combination of hydrogen gas and hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits. | LitMetric

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the combination of H gas inhalation and administration of hydrogen-rich acetated Ringer's solution (HS) could protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.

Methods: In Experiment 1, rabbits were randomly assigned to a 1.2% H gas group, HS group, 1.2% H gas + HS group (combination group), or control group (n = 6 per group). The H concentration of HS was 0.65 mM. H was inhaled for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion. HS (20 mL/kg) was divided into six bolus injections at 10-min intervals, starting 5 min before reperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia was produced by occluding the abdominal aorta for 15 min. Neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed 7 days after reperfusion. In Experiment 2, H concentrations in spinal cord tissue according to the administration of 1.2% H gas or HS were compared by measuring the electric current through a platinum needle electrode (n = 2). In Experiment 3, rabbits were assigned to a 2% H gas group or control group (n = 6 per group). Spinal cord ischemia was produced and neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed as in Experiment 1.

Results: There were no significant differences among the groups in the neurologic and histopathologic outcomes in Experiments 1 and 3. Bolus administration of HS (10 mL) transiently increased the current to only 1/30th and 1/27th of the plateau current with 1.2% H gas inhalation in two animals.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the combination of 1.2% H gas inhalation and administration of a hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury and that the increase in H concentration in spinal cord tissue after administration of HS is very low compared to 1.2% H gas inhalation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal cord
28
12% gas
20
gas inhalation
16
solution protect
12
protect ischemic
12
ischemic spinal
12
cord injury
12
neurologic histopathologic
12
group
9
gas
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!