Objective: To assess surgical success and patient-reported outcomes of perineal urethrostomy via midline approach.

Materials And Methods: Charts of patients undergoing primary perineal urethrostomy between May 2008 and June 2022 were reviewed. Background characteristics were assessed; success was defined as freedom from re-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using a cross-sectional phone survey. Several validated questionnaires were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life, and erectile dysfunction.

Results: Among 1768 urethroplasties performed over the study period, 103 patients (5.8%) underwent midline perineal urethrostomy. Surgery was successful in 95.1% of cases (98/103); 5 patients (4.9%) required re-intervention at a median of 8.7 months. Post-operative complications occurred in 5.8% of cases (6/103) and were both mild and self-limited. Forty-nine patients (47.6%) were reached via phone survey at a median of 61 months post-operatively. Some questions were not answered by all patients. Most patients (42/49, 86%) were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results, and 82% (40/49) reported an improvement in their overall health. Most patients (31/41, 76%) were unbothered by sitting to urinate. Although 20% of patients (10/49) reported post-operative urinary symptoms that interfered "a lot" with their daily life, only 3 (6%) of these patients reported dissatisfaction with the outcome. Regarding sexual function, 64% (27/42) reported indifference to or increased satisfaction with sexual encounters vs before surgery. The rate of de novo erectile dysfunction was 24% (12/49).

Conclusion: The midline approach to perineal urethrostomy provides excellent, durable success rates with high levels of patient satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perineal urethrostomy
20
patients
9
midline approach
8
approach perineal
8
patient satisfaction
8
phone survey
8
perineal
5
urethrostomy
5
algorithmic midline
4
urethrostomy associated
4

Similar Publications

This study aims to report the oncological, surgical and functional outcomes in 15 patients with locally advanced penile cancer who underwent total penile amputation with perineal urethrostomy (PU). A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2018 to September 2023. Outcomes included postoperative complications, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We present retrospective data of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (Re-TURBT) at a tertiary care center.

Materials And Methods: Records of all NMIBC patients undergoing Re-TURBT between March 2021 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were risk stratified based on TURBT pathology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Distal anterior urethral strictures (DAUS) affect the meatus, navicular fossa (NF) and penile urethra (PU). The main causes are inflammatory (lichen sclerosous [LS]), traumatic iatrogenic, or idiopathic. Post-hypospadias stenosis is common and constitutes a separate entity, dealt with in a separate article.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Treatment of strictures of the male anterior urethra: Bulbar urethra.

Fr J Urol

November 2024

Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.

Background: Bulbar urethral strictures are the most frequently encountered. Their management is standardized and needs to be applied to improve results.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted from December 2020 to December 2023, combined with a summary of recommendations from the American, Canadian, European, and French urological associations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Late metastasis of rectal adenocarcinoma to the penis.

BMJ Case Rep

November 2024

Urology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Rectal cancer metastasising to the penis is an exceptionally rare clinical entity, with less than 80 reported cases. Metastasis to the penis is typically identified in conjunction with widespread metastatic disease and as such is usually associated with a very poor prognosis. We report a case of a man who presented with a metastatic deposit in his penis 15 years after the initial diagnosis of rectal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!