AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent trials show endovascular therapy is effective for patients with large ischemic cores, but it's uncertain which neuroimaging method—noncontrast CT ASPECTS or CT perfusion—is better for defining these cores.* -
  • This retrospective study analyzed 1115 patients with acute strokes treated with endovascular therapy, comparing outcomes based on two definitions of large cores; ASPECTS ≤5 and CTP core volume ≥70 mL.* -
  • Results indicated that patients with CTP-defined cores had significantly worse outcomes compared to those defined by ASPECTS, suggesting CT perfusion may be a more reliable method for selecting candidates for endovascular therapy.*

Article Abstract

Background: Recent trials confirmed the effectiveness of endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic cores. Yet the optimal neuroimaging modalities to define large core remains unclear. We tried to address this question by comparing the functional outcomes in patients receiving thrombectomy selected by either noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) or computed tomography perfusion (CTP).

Methods: This study retrospectively selected patients enrolled in the International Stroke Perfusion Registry between August 2011 and April 2022. Patients with acute stroke with large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation treated with endovascular therapy were included. All received both CTP and noncontrast computed tomography. The primary outcome was defined as poor functional outcome represented by a modified Rankin Scale score of 5 to 6 at 3 months. Large cores were defined in terms of either (1) noncontrast computed tomography ASPECTS ≤5 or (2) core volume ≥70 mL on CTP.

Results: A total of 1115 patients were included in the analysis, of which 90 patients had ASPECTS ≤5 (8.1%) and 97 patients CTP core ≥70 mL (8.7%). A fair agreement between ASPECTS and CTP with a κ value of 0.31 (0.21-0.40) was found. Compared with patients with neither CTP nor ASPECTS large cores, those with only ASPECTS-defined large cores (ie, ASPECTS ≤5; n=56) did not have a higher adjusted odds of poor outcome (29%; odds ratio, 1.84 [0.91-3.73]; =0.089). However, patients with CTP large core but not ASPECTS-defined large core (n=63) had a higher adjusted odds of poor outcome (60%; odds ratio, 3.91 [2.01-7.60]; <0.001). In time-stratified subgroup analysis (>6 versus ≤6 hours), ASPECTS showed no discriminative difference between ≤5 and >5 in poor outcome for patients receiving endovascular therapy within 6 hours.

Conclusions: CTP core ≥70 mL-defined large cores are more predictive of poor outcome than ASPECTS ≤5-defined core in endovascular therapy patients, particularly within 6 hours after stroke onset.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045091DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

large core
20
poor outcome
20
computed tomography
20
endovascular therapy
16
large cores
16
aspects-defined large
12
noncontrast computed
12
aspects ≤5
12
patients ctp
12
patients
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!