Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Infection is one of the most feared complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and is difficult to manage in irradiated patients. We present the first case of bilateral breast reconstruction with infected expanders salvaged by performing a reverse abdominoplasty.
Presentation Of Case: A 64-year-old woman with a history of locally advanced bilateral breast cancer underwent modified bilateral radical mastectomy and postmastectomy radiotherapy. We performed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants. However, the patient developed a mild infection of the expanders, which was treated with targeted oral antibiotic therapy. The response to treatment was favorable, allowing us to salvage the reconstruction with a reverse abdominoplasty.
Discussion: Traditionally, the management of infected breast prostheses has consisted of removal of the infected implant, a complication that forces a delay in the reconstructive process. Successful reports of salvage of infected prostheses have been described in the literature. On the other hand, we were able to salvage the reconstruction by performing a reverse abdominoplasty, which allowed us to resect the irradiated tissue and provide adequate non-irradiated soft tissue coverage for the replaced implants.
Conclusion: Reverse abdominoplasty offers an acceptable aesthetic result with much less donor site morbidity and represents a valid alternative to other complex reconstruction techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10955662 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109490 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!