A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Vibration-based mitigation of noxious-evoked responses to skin puncture in neonates and infants: a randomised controlled trial. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how a gentle vibratory stimulus affects brain responses to painful skin punctures in infants and whether certain behavioral signs could predict these responses.* -
  • Conducted in a neonatal ICU, 134 infants were randomly assigned to receive either the vibratory stimulus or no stimulus before a heel stick, measuring brain activity via EEG to assess pain response.* -
  • Results showed that the vibratory stimulus significantly reduced brain responses to pain, but behavioral signs (like facial expressions) were not reliable indicators of pain levels in the brain.*

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of a non-noxious vibratory stimulus on noxious-evoked cortical responses to skin puncture and to determine whether the presence of certain behavioural components may be used to predict such cortical responses.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Level IV neonatal intensive care unit at a stand-alone children's hospital.

Patients: 134 hospitalised infants between 36 and 52 weeks' postmenstrual age and ordered to receive a clinically required laboratory draw.

Interventions: Infants randomised to receive the intervention, a vibratory stimulus at the site of skin puncture beginning 10 s prior to a heel stick, or the control, no vibration.

Main Outcome Measures: Electroencephalography and video recording time-locked to the deployment of the lancet for the skin puncture. Noxious-evoked cortical responses were measured by the area under the curve in the somatosensory region contralateral to the skin puncture. Behavioural responses were coded through video analysis.

Results: Noxious-evoked cortical responses were significantly reduced in participants receiving the vibratory stimulus compared with the control (frontal, p<0.0001; central, p0.0088; central-parietal, p0.0111). There were no significant differences in behavioural responses between groups (all p>0.05).

Conclusions: A non-noxious vibratory stimulus presented prior to and continuing simultaneously with skin puncture significantly mitigates nociception in hospitalised infants. The presence or absence of facial expression components is inadequate to reliably predict pain signalling in the brain.

Trial Registration Number: NCT04050384.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326588DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin puncture
24
vibratory stimulus
16
noxious-evoked cortical
12
cortical responses
12
responses skin
8
infants randomised
8
randomised controlled
8
non-noxious vibratory
8
hospitalised infants
8
skin
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!