Background: Second victim is the name given to the healthcare personnel-most often a nursing professional-involved with the error that led to the adverse event to a patient and who, as a result, have experienced negative psychological effects. Research with second victims has increased over the years, however concerns exist with regards to the ethical risks imposed upon these individuals.
Aim: To explore the extent to which research with second victims of adverse events in healthcare settings adhere to ethical requirements.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and using the following databases: PUBMED, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Original research of any study design focused on second victims and published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese in 2014-2023 were included. A critical narrative approach was used to discuss the findings.
Ethical Considerations: The review followed ethical guidelines emphasizing accurate authorship attribution and truthful data reporting.
Results: Fifteen studies using qualitative ( = 2), quantitative ( = 10), and mixed-method ( = 3) designs were included. Over half were not assessed by a research ethics committee, with questionable reasons given by the authors. One-third did not refer to having used an informed consent. In two studies, participants were recruited by their workplace superiors, which could potentially right to autonomy and voluntary participation.
Conclusion: Over half of the included studies with second victims did not comply with fundamental ethical aspects, with risk to inflict respect for individual autonomy, confidentiality, and of not causing any harm to participants.
Implications For Nursing Research: Healthcare personnel involved in adverse events are most often nursing professionals; therefore, any breach of ethics in research with this population is likely to directly affect their rights as research participants. We provide recommendations to promote better research practices with second victims towards safeguarding their rights as research participants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330241238345 | DOI Listing |
J Neuroophthalmol
January 2025
Faculty of Medicine (DR), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (LBD), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science (EM), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Background: In the aftermath of an adverse event, the first priority is to provide care for the patient, known as the first victim. However, the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in these events, known as "second victims", have been largely overlooked. This review aims to consolidate existing knowledge on second victim syndrome (SVS), explore its unique implications for neuro-ophthalmologists, and suggest support strategies to increase awareness and meet the needs of affected colleagues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAJR Am J Roentgenol
January 2025
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Phipps B110, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Trauma Violence Abuse
January 2025
Criminology, School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sexual violence experienced by LGBTQ+ adults is a rapidly expanding field of academic study. Therefore, there is a need for a synthesis and critical analysis of the research. The aim of this review was to conduct a critical review of the academic literature on adult LGBTQ+ sexual violence and to provide recommendations for future research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMalays J Med Sci
December 2024
Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
When a medical error occurs, the instinct to blame healthcare professionals may seems like a way to ensure they learn from their mistakes. However, in today's healthcare landscape, the blame culture, coupled with the fear of litigation, proves detrimental to improving patient care. This culture fosters a reluctance among healthcare professionals to openly disclose mistakes, depriving them of valuable learning opportunities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Child Adolesc Psychiatry
July 2024
Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Introduction: Some targets of relational peer victimization become depressed because of their poor treatment. These associations are well documented in youth but are rarely studied in adults.
Methods: The longitudinal pathways between relational peer victimization (being excluded, stonewalled, etc.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!