The concept and policies of multicancer early detection (MCED) have gained significant attention from governments worldwide in recent years. In the era of burgeoning artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the integration of MCED with AI has become a prevailing trend, giving rise to a plethora of MCED AI products. However, due to the heterogeneity of both the detection targets and the AI technologies, the overall diversity of MCED AI products remains considerable. The types of detection targets encompass protein biomarkers, cell-free DNA, or combinations of these biomarkers. In the development of AI models, different model training approaches are employed, including datasets of case-control studies or real-world cancer screening datasets. Various validation techniques, such as cross-validation, location-wise validation, and time-wise validation, are used. All of the factors show significant impacts on the predictive efficacy of MCED AIs. After the completion of AI model development, deploying the MCED AIs in clinical practice presents numerous challenges, including presenting the predictive reports, identifying the potential locations and types of tumors, and addressing cancer-related information, such as clinical follow-up and treatment. This study reviews several mature MCED AI products currently available in the market, detecting their composing factors from serum biomarker detection, MCED AI training/validation, and the clinical application. This review illuminates the challenges encountered by existing MCED AI products across these stages, offering insights into the continued development and obstacles within the field of MCED AI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10931531PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16050862DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mced products
16
mced
10
artificial intelligence
8
early detection
8
detection mced
8
detection targets
8
mced ais
8
detection
5
integrating artificial
4
intelligence advancing
4

Similar Publications

Cost-effectiveness of a multicancer early detection test in the US.

Am J Manag Care

December 2024

GRAIL, Inc., 1525 O'Brien Dr, Menlo Park, CA 94025. Email:

Objectives: Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing could result in earlier cancer diagnosis, thereby improving survival and reducing treatment costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing plus usual care (UC) screening while accounting for the impact of clinical uncertainty and population heterogeneity for an MCED test with broad coverage of solid cancer incidence.

Study Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis of MCED testing plus UC vs UC alone in an adult population in the US.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Cost-Effective Two-Step Approach for Multi-Cancer Early Detection in High-Risk Populations.

Cancer Res Commun

January 2025

Research & Development, SeekIn Inc, San Diego, California.

Article Synopsis
  • The two-step cancer screening method uses OncoSeek and SeekInCare to effectively reduce false positives while identifying cancer cases.
  • The first test, OncoSeek, leads to a significantly high number of false positives at 441,450, but when combined with SeekInCare, this drops to just 34,335.
  • Compared to other tests, the two-step approach is much more cost-effective, costing only $713.6 million versus $3,750 million for SeekInCare and $4,745 million for Galleri.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The added benefits of a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test among individuals with multiple risk factors will help policy decision-makers allocate limited healthcare resources. This study sought to estimate the population health implications of adding an MCED test to standard-of-care (SOC) cancer screening tests among individuals aged 50-79 years with additional cancer risk factors (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Integrating Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Tests with Standard Cancer Screening: System Dynamics Model Development and Feasibility Testing.

Pharmacoecon Open

January 2025

Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Background: Cancer screening plays a critical role in early disease detection and improving outcomes. In Australia, established screening protocols for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer have significantly contributed to timely cancer detection. However, the recent introduction of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests arguably can disrupt current screening, yet the extent to which these tests provide additional benefits remains uncertain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cervical cancer screening is a critical public health measure, especially vital for underserved communities where disparities in access and outcomes are pronounced. Despite the life-saving potential of regular screening, numerous barriers-including geographical isolation, cultural and linguistic challenges, and socioeconomic factors-severely hinder accessibility for these populations. Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests emerge as a potentially effective intervention, offering a less invasive, more accessible approach that could transform how screenings are conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!