A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Primary giant hydatid cyst of the retroperitoneum: Diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. | LitMetric

Primary giant hydatid cyst of the retroperitoneum: Diagnosis and therapeutic approaches.

Int J Surg Case Rep

The Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia; Surgery Department A, Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

Published: April 2024

Introduction And Importance: Primary hydatid cyst of the retroperitoneum is an exceedingly rare manifestation of hydatid disease. Diagnosis proves challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, and the condition is typically not suspected when facing a retroperitoneal cystic mass, necessitating awareness among clinicians and surgeons, particularly in endemic regions.

Case Presentation: A 45-year-old male with a three-month history of progressive abdominal enlargement and pain. Living in a rural area, he exhibited a 30 cm, well-defined retroperitoneal cyst, with no guarding confirmed by CT-scan, with characteristic daughter cysts. The diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal hydatid cyst was supported by positive hydatid serology and eosinophilia. Surgical intervention was crucial, and a complete pericystectomy, with 4 cm of pericyst on the aorta due to safety concerns, was performed after three months of preoperative albendazole-based treatment. The postoperative course was uneventful, and a two-year follow-up revealed no recurrence.

Clinical Discussion: The prevalence of hydatid disease in North Africa is high, yet retroperitoneal cases are rare. The difficulty to diagnosis retroperitoneal masses, underscores the importance of precise patient evaluation and detailed imaging analysis. Percutaneous puncture is contraindicated due to the risk of dissemination, highlighting even more the significance of accurate preoperative diagnosis. Surgery, coupled with Albendazole treatment, remains the gold-standard, associated with meticulous intraoperative precautions to prevent disease dissemination.

Conclusion: Primary retroperitoneal hydatid cyst is rare. Diagnosis is difficult. Precise determination of patient's background and detailed analysis of imaging findings are mandatory. Percutaneous puncture is forbidden as it leads to disease spreading or even anaphylactic shock. Surgical excision is the gold-standard.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945243PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109484DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydatid cyst
16
cyst retroperitoneum
8
hydatid disease
8
primary retroperitoneal
8
retroperitoneal hydatid
8
percutaneous puncture
8
hydatid
7
diagnosis
6
retroperitoneal
6
cyst
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!