Commentary: Causal relationship between particulate matter 2.5 and diabetes: two sample Mendelian randomization.

Front Public Health

Department of Dermatology, Yunnan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Published: March 2024

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10925619PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353982DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

commentary causal
4
causal relationship
4
relationship particulate
4
particulate matter
4
matter diabetes
4
diabetes sample
4
sample mendelian
4
mendelian randomization
4
commentary
1
relationship
1

Similar Publications

Ena-bile-ing liver cancer growth.

Science

January 2025

Gastroenterology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Bile acids differentially affect immune cell responses to liver cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Conserved features of recombination control in vertebrates.

PLoS Biol

January 2025

Research Group Meiotic Recombination and Genome Instability, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.

A recent study in PLOS Biology on the epigenetic recombination regulator PRDM9 in salmonid fish reveals that its function has been preserved across vertebrates for hundreds of millions of years, with rapidly evolving DNA-binding domains being a defining attribute.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The European Commission's Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030 aims to ensure equal opportunities and rights for all individuals, including those with intellectual disabilities. People with intellectual disabilities are often underrepresented in cancer prevention and screening policies, leading to disparities in health outcomes and early mortality. The intersection of intellectual disability, cancer, and depression represents an underexplored area in healthcare research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We recently questioned the utility of testing for proportional hazards in survival analysis. Here we expand on why the proportional hazards assumption is both implausible and unnecessary in most medical studies, particularly in randomized trials. We conclude that using survival analysis methods that do not rely on proportional hazards is typically the preferred course of action.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!