Machine learning-based models to predict aquatic ecological risk for engineered nanoparticles: using hazard concentration for 5% of species as an endpoint.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, People's Republic of China.

Published: April 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The research focuses on predicting the ecological risks of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) at the community and ecosystem levels, which is largely unexplored in existing studies.
  • A novel approach utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques was employed to assess the harmful concentrations of twelve different ENPs for aquatic species, establishing various predictive models for assessing these thresholds.
  • The developed ML models demonstrated strong performance with high accuracy rates and were further validated, highlighting the importance of specific nanostructural properties in improving toxicity predictions.

Article Abstract

Assessment and prediction for the ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) at the community or ecosystem levels represents a critical step toward a comprehensive understanding of the ecological risks of ENPs. Current studies on predicting the ecotoxicity of ENPs primarily focus on the cellular and individual levels, with limited exploration at the community or ecosystem levels. Herein, we present the first of the reports for the direct prediction of aquatic ecological risk for ENPs at the community level using machine learning (ML) approaches in the field of computational toxicology. Specifically, we extensively collected the threshold concentrations of twelve ENPs including metal- and carbon-based nanoparticles for aquatic species, i.e., hazardous concentrations at which 5% of species are harmed (HC), established by a species sensitivity distribution. Afterwards, we used eight supervised ML methods including Adaboost, artificial neural network, C4.5 decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine to develop nine classification models and four regression models, respectively, for the qualitative and quantitative prediction of HC. The evaluation of model performance yielded the internal validation accuracy of all classification models ranging from 71.4 to 100%, and the determination coefficient of regression models ranging from 0.702 to 0.999, indicating that the developed models showed good performance. By using a cross-validation method and an application domain characterization, the selected models were further validated to have powerful predictive ability. Furthermore, the incorporation of three nanostructural descriptors (metal oxide sublimation enthalpy, zeta potential, and specific surface area) linked to toxicity mechanisms (the release of metal ions, the stability of dispersions of particles in aqueous suspensions, and the surface properties of the material) effectively enhanced the prediction power and mechanistic interpretability of the selected models. These findings would not only be beneficial in the screening of ENPs with potential high ecological risks that need to be tested as a priority but also contribute to the development of environmental regulations and standards for ENPs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32723-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

models
8
aquatic ecological
8
ecological risk
8
engineered nanoparticles
8
enps community
8
community ecosystem
8
ecosystem levels
8
ecological risks
8
classification models
8
regression models
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!