AI Article Synopsis

  • * Using a large dataset from camera traps across 17 countries, the researchers applied mixed-effects models to analyze the probability of these animals being detected in groups, revealing significant variability in group formation even among species traditionally thought to be solitary.
  • * The findings suggest that resource distribution (like patchiness) and external conditions (such as winter severity) influence whether these animals aggregate, underscoring the need to better understand the complexities of social behavior in solitary species for a comprehensive view of their ecology and social interactions.

Article Abstract

The social system of animals involves a complex interplay between physiology, natural history, and the environment. Long relied upon discrete categorizations of "social" and "solitary" inhibit our capacity to understand species and their interactions with the world around them. Here, we use a globally distributed camera trapping dataset to test the drivers of aggregating into groups in a species complex (martens and relatives, family , Order ) assumed to be obligately solitary. We use a simple quantification, the probability of being detected in a group, that was applied across our globally derived camera trap dataset. Using a series of binomial generalized mixed-effects models applied to a dataset of 16,483 independent detections across 17 countries on four continents we test explicit hypotheses about potential drivers of group formation. We observe a wide range of probabilities of being detected in groups within the solitary model system, with the probability of aggregating in groups varying by more than an order of magnitude. We demonstrate that a species' context-dependent proclivity toward aggregating in groups is underpinned by a range of resource-related factors, primarily the distribution of resources, with increasing patchiness of resources facilitating group formation, as well as interactions between environmental conditions (resource constancy/winter severity) and physiology (energy storage capabilities). The wide variation in propensities to aggregate with conspecifics observed here highlights how continued failure to recognize complexities in the social behaviors of apparently solitary species limits our understanding not only of the individual species but also the causes and consequences of group formation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962950PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2312252121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group formation
16
aggregating groups
12
solitary species
8
species complex
8
drivers group
8
species
5
group
5
global remote
4
remote camera
4
camera data
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!