Introduction: Colonoscopy is a crucial procedure for various clinical purposes, including screening for colorectal cancer. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for its success. Poor bowel preparation can lead to bad outcomes. An objective assessment of bowel preparation quality is typically only possible after the colonoscope is inserted. This study aimed to objectively correlate the clarity of last rectal effluent, directly collected in a transparent container, with the quality of bowel preparation, and compare it with patient-reported descriptions.

Methods: This prospective, single-centre, case-control study obtained ethical clearance and included patients aged >18 years undergoing colonoscopies. Cases included patients who collected the last rectal effluent and took photographs, while controls relied on verbal descriptions. Data collected included demographics, clinical information, bowel preparation quality, and lastly, stool clarity. A statistical analysis was performed to identify correlations and associations.

Results: Of the 70 included patients, 45 were male. The mean age was 35.8 ± 14.3 years. Cases had a higher mean age (37.8 ± 14.6). A higher number of cases had comorbidities (11, 68.8%). Photographic recording of the last rectal effluent was not associated with the adequacy of bowel preparation. Thin yellow fluid was the most common last-rectal effluent clarity (33, 47.1%). Thin, clear fluid was significantly associated with adequate bowel preparation.

Conclusion: Objective assessment of last rectal effluent clarity correlates with the quality of bowel preparation. This can improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopies and potentially reduce the need for repeat procedures, contributing to better patient outcomes and cost savings in healthcare systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924430PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53828DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bowel preparation
36
rectal effluent
20
quality bowel
16
included patients
12
bowel
10
preparation
9
clarity rectal
8
case-control study
8
adequate bowel
8
objective assessment
8

Similar Publications

Bowel regimens before radical cystectomy: An analysis of a modern cohort.

Int J Urol

January 2025

Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Introduction: Bowel regimens (BR) before radical cystectomy (RC) are currently not recommended by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, as prior studies have shown BRs lead to worsened outcomes. However, many of those studies have used historic literature before recent surgical advancements such as minimally invasive RC and have not investigated the impact BRs have by type of urinary diversion. Our goal is to determine the outcomes of preoperative BR in patients undergoing RC based on diversion type using a modern patient cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) has shown benefits such as reduced pain, fewer wound complications, and improved cosmesis. In colorectal anastomosis during NOSE, double staple anastomosis (DSA) and triple stapled technique (TSA) are common. However, a novel single stapled anastomosis (SSA) technique, utilising two laparoscopically placed purse strings and only four 5 mm ports, has emerged.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aims: Optimization of bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is debated. Guidelines recommend 2 L of iso-osmolar polyethylene glycol (PEG) to improve SBCE visibility. We compared the efficacy of the standard 2 L PEG solution with a 1 L PEG plus ascorbate (PEG-ASC) preparation, which has already been established for large-bowel preparation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Patients awaiting heart transplants often require colonoscopies due to bleeding or screening needs, but there's limited research on the safety of these procedures for individuals on inotropic medications or mechanical circulatory support.
  • A study was conducted from 2015 to 2021 with 92 heart failure patients undergoing colonoscopy while on advanced heart failure therapies, such as inotropes or mechanical devices.
  • Results indicated that the most common reason for colonoscopy was cancer screening, with significant findings including 8% of screening procedures revealing advanced adenomas and 17% of bleeding-related colonoscopies identifying sources needing intervention, but no major complications related to anesthesia were reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving colonoscopy quality in the national VA healthcare system.

Contemp Clin Trials

December 2024

San Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco VA Healthcare System, United States of America. Electronic address:

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!