Background: Composites with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles (CSN) are used recently; however, this combination needs to be studied in different cavity designs.

Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with different cavity geometries restored with different types of composite resins incorporated with 0.2% CSN.

Methods: About 130 extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were embedded in acrylic molds 2 mm below cementoenamel junction, divided into five groups for cavity preparations of standardized dimensions. Group 1: (control) intact teeth ( = 10), Group 2: Class I cavities ( = 40), Group 3: Class II mesio-occlusal (MO) ( = 40), Group 4: Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) ( = 40). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were subdivided into four subgroups for composite restoration; A: Neo spectra ST-Universal (NST); B: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TNC); C: NST + CSN; and D: TNC + CSN and tested for fracture resistance using universal testing machine.

Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used for data analysis ( ≤ 0.05).

Results: In all groups, the highest fracture resistance was found in MOD cavities, followed by MO and least in Class I cavities. Subgroup D (TNC with CSN) showed the highest fracture resistance in all groups ( ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: Tetric N-Ceramic bulk fill with 0.25% CSN showed high fracture resistance in cavities with different geometries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923228PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_264_23DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture resistance
24
maxillary premolars
12
group class
12
resistance maxillary
8
composite resins
8
resins incorporated
8
chitosan nanoparticles
8
class cavities
8
tnc csn
8
highest fracture
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!