AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the economic impact of interventions by board-certified pharmacists in palliative care (BCPPPs) compared to non-certified pharmacists on cancer patients using narcotics.
  • Results showed that a higher percentage of BCPPPs successfully reduced drug costs and the medical economic benefit of their interventions was significantly greater, particularly in minimizing adverse drug reactions.
  • Ultimately, BCPPP-managed pharmaceutical interventions for cancer patients are indicated to provide more substantial economic benefits than those provided by non-certified pharmacists in Japan.

Article Abstract

Background: The Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences specializes in pharmacology in the field of palliative medicine. More than 700 board-certified pharmacists in palliative pharmacy (BCPPP) are actively involved in palliative pharmacotherapy at various hospitals and pharmacies. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic effect of pharmaceutical interventions by BCPPPs.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 27 medical centers and analyzed the medical economic effect of interventions by BCPPPs (17 pharmacists) and non-BCPPPs (24 pharmacists) on patients using medical narcotics for cancer pain in September 2021.

Results: The percentage of patients who received a pharmaceutical intervention and whose drug costs were reduced by pharmacist intervention was significantly higher in the BCPPP group than in the non-BCPPP group. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in drug cost reduction per patient per month (BCPPP group: $0.89 [-$64.91 to $106.76] vs. non-BCPPP group $0.00 [-$1,828.95 to $25.82]; P = 0.730), the medical economic benefit of pharmacist intervention in avoiding or reducing adverse drug reactions was higher in the BCPPP group ($103.18 [$0.00 to $628.03]) than in the non-BCPPP group ($0.00 [$0.00 to $628.03]) (P = 0.070). The total medical economic benefit-the sum of these-was significantly higher in the BCPPP group ($88.82 [-$14.62 to $705.37]) than in the non-BCPPP group ($0.66 [-$1,200.93 to $269.61]) (P = 0.006).

Conclusion: Pharmacological intervention for patients with cancer using medical narcotics may have a greater medical economic benefit when managed by BCPPPs than by non-certified pharmacists in Japan.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical economic
20
bcppp group
16
non-bcppp group
16
medical narcotics
12
higher bcppp
12
medical
9
economic pharmaceutical
8
pharmaceutical interventions
8
board-certified pharmacists
8
pharmacists palliative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!