Background: To restore breast sensibility, some centers are offering nerve reconstruction as a component of implant and flap-based breast reconstruction. To interpret and contextualize the results of these procedures, it is necessary to understand the normal range of breast sensibility, the factors that affect it, and the best methods for its objective measurement.
Methods: We conducted systematic and comprehensive searches across PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using keywords and controlled vocabulary for the concepts of the breast, nipple, areola, and measurement. The search results were imported into Rayyan QCRI for a blinded screening of titles and abstracts. Studies were evaluated for bias using RevMan 5 software. The results of sensory measurements were pooled, and a quantitative summary of breast sensibility was generated.
Results: A total of 36 articles were identified, including retrospective, cross-sectional, and prospective studies. Although there were some consistent findings across studies, such that breast sensibility is inversely related to breast volume, there was wide variability in the following parameters: population, breast condition, measurement modality, anatomic areas of measurement, and sensibility findings. This heterogeneity precluded the generation of normative breast sensibility measurements. Furthermore, we detected a high degree of bias in most studies, due to self-selection of participants and failure to record patient characteristics that may alter sensibility.
Conclusions: The literature lacks consistent data delineating normative values for breast sensibility. Standardized measurements of healthy volunteers with various breast characteristics are necessary to elucidate normative values and interpret efforts to restore sensibility in breast reconstruction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.057 | DOI Listing |
Ann Chir Plast Esthet
December 2024
Service de chirurgie plastique reconstructrice et esthétique, centre de traitement des brûlés, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), université de Paris-Cité, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France. Electronic address:
Background And Objectives: Sensibility of the breast area is a key factor in quality-of-life evaluation after breast reconstruction (BR). Breast sensation can be assessed using numerous tools that are already largely described in the literature, including the Semmes Weinstein filaments which remain the most frequently used. Although different reconstruction techniques are available, post-BR sensitivity is rarely described.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMolecules
November 2024
Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Melanoma occurs in various forms and body areas, not only in the cutis, but also in mucous membranes and the uvea. Rarer subtypes of that cancer differ in genomic aberrations, which cause their minor sensibility to regular cutaneous melanoma therapies. Therefore, it is essential to discover new strategies for treating rare forms of melanoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicina (Kaunas)
October 2024
Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Rīga, Latvia.
: Sensation of the breast skin and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is commonly assumed to be diminished or completely absent following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant- or expander-based reconstruction. The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate breast skin and NAC long-term touch pressure sensibility, from 1 month to 1 year, after NSM followed by reconstruction with an implant or expander, and patient quality of life (QoL), hypothesizing that sensibility may diminish with a small progressive return throughout the postoperative period. : This was achieved by performing sensation tests using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) in nine predefined points of the breast and NAC, a two-point discrimination test (TPD) in the four quadrants of the breast, and QoL assessment using the BREAST-Q.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
September 2024
The Plastic Surgery Center, The Institute for Advanced Reconstruction, 535 Sycamore Avenue, Shrewsbury, NJ 07702, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
April 2024
The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA; Seton Plastic and Hand Surgery, Ascension Medical Group, Austin, TX, USA.
Background: To restore breast sensibility, some centers are offering nerve reconstruction as a component of implant and flap-based breast reconstruction. To interpret and contextualize the results of these procedures, it is necessary to understand the normal range of breast sensibility, the factors that affect it, and the best methods for its objective measurement.
Methods: We conducted systematic and comprehensive searches across PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using keywords and controlled vocabulary for the concepts of the breast, nipple, areola, and measurement.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!