A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biofilm and suspension-based cultivation of microalgae to treat anaerobic digestate food effluent (ADFE). | LitMetric

Biofilm and suspension-based cultivation of microalgae to treat anaerobic digestate food effluent (ADFE).

Sci Total Environ

Algae R&D Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia; Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: May 2024

Anaerobic digestion of organic waste produces effluent (ADE) that requires further treatment. Biofilm-based microalgal cultivation is a favoured approach to ADE treatment. This study compared Chlorella sp. MUR 268 and Scenedesmus sp. MUR 269 in biofilm and suspension cultures to treat anaerobic digestate food effluent (ADFE). Chlorella sp. MUR 268 biofilm had significantly higher biomass (50.38 g m) than Scenedesmus sp. biofilm (9.39 g m). Conversely, Scenedesmus sp. yielded 1.5 times more biomass (1.2 g L) than Chlorella sp. in suspension. Chlorella sp. biofilm had 49.3 % higher areal productivity than suspension, while Scenedesmus sp. showed 87.3 % higher areal growth in suspension. Chlorella sp. MUR 268 and Scenedesmus sp. MUR 269 significantly removed nutrients in ADFE. In suspension, COD, ammoniacal nitrogen, and phosphate were reduced to 94.9, 5.2, and 5.98 mg L for Chlorella sp. MUR 268, and 245, 2.89, and 3.22 mg L for Scenedesmus sp. MUR 269, respectively. In biofilm, Chlorella sp. MUR 268 achieved reductions to 149.9, 1.16, and 3.57 mg L, while Scenedesmus sp. MUR 269 achieved 100.2, 6.9 and 2.07 mg L. Most of these values are below the recommended effluent discharge standard, highlighting the efficacy of this system in ADFE treatment. Biofilm cultures fixed 68-81 % of removed nitrogen in biomass, while in suspension, only 55-71 % ended in the biomass. Chlorella sp. MUR 268 biofilm fixed 88 % of removed phosphorus, while Scenedesmus sp. MUR 269 suspension fixed more phosphorus (55 %) than the biofilm counterpart (34 %). This biofilm design offers advantages like simplified, cost-effective operation, easy biomass recovery, and reduced water usage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171320DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chlorella mur
24
mur 268
24
scenedesmus mur
20
mur 269
20
mur
11
biofilm
10
treat anaerobic
8
anaerobic digestate
8
digestate food
8
food effluent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!