Introduction: The evolving landscape of surgical interventions for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) necessitates a reassessment of the traditional gold standard of lobectomy versus emerging sublobar resections, prompting this critical narrative review.

Areas Covered: This review encompasses recent randomized controlled trials, notably JCOG0802/WJOG4607L and CALGB140503, comparing lobectomy and sublobar resections for early-stage NSCLC, focusing on tumor size and recurrence rates. It also discusses the importance of individualized decision-making, future research avenues, and technological advancements in lung cancer surgery.

Expert Opinion: In this rapidly evolving field, sublobar resections emerge as a viable alternative to lobectomy for tumors smaller than 2 cm in early-stage NSCLC, necessitating precise patient selection and ongoing technological advancements to optimize outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2324083DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
12
sublobar resections
12
early-stage nsclc
8
technological advancements
8
advances lung
4
cancer surgery
4
surgery role
4
role segmentectomy
4
early-stage
4
segmentectomy early-stage
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!