AI Article Synopsis

  • Torsional stiffness in athletic footwear impacts injury prevention and sports performance, especially in badminton, yet limited research exists on its specific effects in badminton shoes.
  • This study assessed the biomechanical effects of three stiffness levels (50D, 60D, 70D) on 15 male badminton players during various tasks, measuring factors like joint kinematics and ground reaction forces.
  • Results indicated that the 70D shoe provided optimal ankle flexibility and reduced injury risk, while the 60D shoe was found to balance performance and safety, suggesting a middle stiffness level is ideal for badminton players.

Article Abstract

Torsional stiffness of athletic footwear plays a crucial role in preventing injury and improving sports performance. Yet, there is a lack of research focused on the biomechanical effect of torsional stiffness in badminton shoes. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the influence of three different levels of torsional stiffness in badminton shoes on biomechanical characteristics, sports performance, and injury risk in badminton players. Fifteen male players, aged 22.8 ± 1.96 years, participated in the study, performing badminton-specific tasks, including forehand clear stroke [left foot (FCL) and right foot (FCR)], 45-degree sidestep cutting (45C), and consecutive vertical jumps (CVJ). The tasks were conducted wearing badminton shoes of torsional stiffness measured with Shore D hardness 50, 60, and 70 (referred to as 50D, 60D, and 70D, respectively). The primary biomechanical parameters included ankle, knee, and MTP joint kinematics, ankle and knee joint moments, peak ground reaction forces, joint range of motion (ROM), and stance time. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was employed for normally distributed data and Friedman tests for non-normally distributed data. The 70D shoe exhibited the highest ankle dorsiflexion and lowest ankle inversion peak angles during 45C task. The 60D shoe showed significantly lower knee abduction angle and coronal motions compared to the 50D and 70D shoes. Increased torsional stiffness reduced stance time in the FCR task. No significant differences were observed in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral ground reaction forces (GRF). However, the 70D shoe demonstrated higher vertical GRF than the 50D shoe while performing the FCR task, particularly during 70% - 75% of stance. Findings from this study revealed the significant role of torsional stiffness in reducing injury risk and optimizing performance during badminton tasks, indicating that shoes with an intermediate level of stiffness (60D) could provide a beneficial balance between flexibility and stability. These findings may provide practical references in guiding future badminton shoe research and development. Further research is necessary to explore the long-term effects of altering stiffness, considering factors such as athletic levels and foot morphology, to understand of the influence of torsional stiffness on motion biomechanics and injury prevalence in badminton-specific tasks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915609PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.196DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

torsional stiffness
32
stiffness badminton
12
badminton shoes
12
stiffness
10
influence torsional
8
sports performance
8
injury risk
8
badminton-specific tasks
8
ankle knee
8
ground reaction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!