Validity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

EJVES Vasc Forum

Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, AGAPLESION DIAKONIE KLINIKEN KASSEL, Kassel, Germany.

Published: February 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare problem mainly affecting younger people and diagnosing it can take a long time, which is not good for patient health.
  • Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is usually used to diagnose TOS, but it uses radiation which can be harmful to younger patients.
  • The study found that ultrasound (US) is a better option because it doesn't use radiation, is easy to access, and works well for diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS).

Article Abstract

Objective: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare disorder mostly seen in younger individuals. Although patient wellbeing is relevantly impaired, it often takes a long time before the diagnosis is made. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is routinely used despite its radiation exposure, which is a major concern in this young patient population. Moreover, DSA offers limited opportunities for functional assessment. By contrast, ultrasonography is widely accessible without causing radiation exposure and allows for flexible functional assessment. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) was a viable alternative to DSA in diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS).

Methods: Patients, referred to a tertiary centre for evaluation of suspected TOS, were recruited into the study. DSA was routinely performed with the patient's arms both in the raised (abducted) and neutral (adducted) position. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists assessed the resulting images for the presence of aTOS. Additionally, two examiners performed US according to a standardised protocol. The reference for presence of aTOS was the DSA based interdisciplinary vascular conference consensus. Inter-rater agreement and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed between assessors and diagnostic methods.

Results: Fifty one consecutive patients (two thirds female) aged 39.3 ± 13.0 years were included within 11 months. US agreement was excellent at 0.94 (0.841-0.980), DSA agreement for vascular surgeons was good at 0.779 (0.479-1.000), whereas it was moderate at 0.546 (0.046-1.000) for radiologists. Results suggest that DSA is untenable as the gold standard for aTOS diagnosis. In LCA, US was shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of aTOS.

Conclusion: US examination is a valid test for the detection of haemodynamically relevant compression of arteries in the diagnostic work up of aTOS using a standardised protocol. The role of DSA as the gold standard should be reviewed and needs to be reconsidered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917999PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.02.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thoracic outlet
8
outlet syndrome
8
dsa
8
dsa routinely
8
radiation exposure
8
functional assessment
8
vascular surgeons
8
presence atos
8
standardised protocol
8
gold standard
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!