A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.

J Biomed Inform

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address:

Published: March 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The review highlights the increasing involvement of AI and ML in healthcare, emphasizing concerns about fairness and bias that may worsen existing health inequities among different populations.
  • It summarizes techniques for evaluating and improving AI/ML model fairness using real-world data, revealing limitations in current research regarding diverse diseases and the availability of public datasets.
  • The conclusion points out unresolved issues in understanding the root causes of bias and calls for further investigation into fairness in AI/ML applications within healthcare, particularly leveraging real-world data.

Article Abstract

Objective: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in health care to aid clinical decisions is widespread. However, as AI and ML take important roles in health care, there are concerns about AI and ML associated fairness and bias. That is, an AI tool may have a disparate impact, with its benefits and drawbacks unevenly distributed across societal strata and subpopulations, potentially exacerbating existing health inequities. Thus, the objectives of this scoping review were to summarize existing literature and identify gaps in the topic of tackling algorithmic bias and optimizing fairness in AI/ML models using real-world data (RWD) in health care domains.

Methods: We conducted a thorough review of techniques for assessing and optimizing AI/ML model fairness in health care when using RWD in health care domains. The focus lies on appraising different quantification metrics for accessing fairness, publicly accessible datasets for ML fairness research, and bias mitigation approaches.

Results: We identified 11 papers that are focused on optimizing model fairness in health care applications. The current research on mitigating bias issues in RWD is limited, both in terms of disease variety and health care applications, as well as the accessibility of public datasets for ML fairness research. Existing studies often indicate positive outcomes when using pre-processing techniques to address algorithmic bias. There remain unresolved questions within the field that require further research, which includes pinpointing the root causes of bias in ML models, broadening fairness research in AI/ML with the use of RWD and exploring its implications in healthcare settings, and evaluating and addressing bias in multi-modal data.

Conclusion: This paper provides useful reference material and insights to researchers regarding AI/ML fairness in real-world health care data and reveals the gaps in the field. Fair AI/ML in health care is a burgeoning field that requires a heightened research focus to cover diverse applications and different types of RWD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146346PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104622DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
36
health
10
care
9
fairness
9
scoping review
8
machine learning
8
real-world data
8
fairness bias
8
algorithmic bias
8
fairness ai/ml
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!