A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reconstruction after Pelvic Bone Massive Resection: Evolution and Actuality of 3D-Printing Technology. | LitMetric

Reconstruction after Pelvic Bone Massive Resection: Evolution and Actuality of 3D-Printing Technology.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech

University of Pisa, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Pisa, Italy.

Published: March 2024

Purpose Of The Study: Pelvic reconstructions after massive bone resections are among the most challenging practices in orthopedic surgery. Whether the bone gap results after a trauma, a tumor resection, or it is due to a prosthetic revision, it is mandatory to reconstruct pelvic bone continuity and rebuild the functional thread that connects spine and hip joint. Several different approaches have been described in literature through the decades to achieve those goals.

Material And Methods: To this date, 3D-printed implants represent one of the most promising surgical technologies in orthopedic oncology and complex reconstructive surgery. We present our experience with 3D-printed custom-made pelvic prostheses to fulfi ll bone gaps resulting from massive bone loss due to tumor resections. We retrospectively evaluated 17 cases treated with pelvic bone reconstruction using 3D-printed prostheses. Cases were evaluated in terms of both oncological and functional outcomes.

Results: At the last follow-up, local complications were found in 6 cases (36%): in 4 (23.5%) of them the cause was a local recurrence of the disease, whereas only 2 (12.5%) had non-oncologic issues. The mean MSTS score in our population increased from 8.2 before surgery to 22.3 at the latest clinical control after surgery.

Discussion: 3D-printing technology, used to produce cutting jigs and prosthetic implants, can lead to good clinical and functional outcomes. These encouraging results are comparable with the ones obtained with other more frequently used reconstructive approaches and support custom-made implants as a promising reconstructive approach.

Conclusions: Our data confi rm 3D-printing and custom-made implants as promising technologies that could shape the next future of orthopedic oncology and reconstructive surgery.

Key Words: custom made prosthesis, pelvic reconstruction, orthopedic oncology, cutting jigs, 3D-printing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pelvic bone
12
orthopedic oncology
12
3d-printing technology
8
massive bone
8
cutting jigs
8
custom-made implants
8
implants promising
8
bone
7
pelvic
5
reconstruction pelvic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!