Effect of prolonged operative time on short-term outcomes of open vs minimally invasive proctectomy.

Background: Minimally invasive proctectomy (MIP) may offer advantages over open proctectomy (OP). Increased operative times (OTs) are linked to inferior outcomes for various operations; however, the interplay between OT and approach for proctectomy is not well-established. This study aimed to evaluate associations of increasing OT on 30-day morbidity in OP and MIP cohorts.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program Targeted Proctectomy Dataset was used to identify patients undergoing proctectomy. Cases were stratified by open or minimally invasive surgical approach and following propensity score matching between the groups, and OT quartiles were established for each group. Perioperative outcomes were compared among quartiles, and multivariate regression was used to identify factors associated with prolonged OT.

Results: The median OT was longer for MIP (271 vs 232 min; P < .01). Although increased OT was associated with higher overall morbidity for both open and minimally invasive approaches, this effect was more pronounced in OP than in MIP (63.2% vs 38.4%, respectively; P < .001). Factors associated with prolonged OT included the procedure performed, male sex, higher body mass index scores, diverting ileostomy, and, in malignant disease, mid or lower and T4 tumors (all P < .05).

Conclusion: Herein, prolonged OT was associated with worse short-term outcomes for both OP and MIP cases; however, its detrimental effect was more pronounced for open surgery than for minimally invasive surgery. Our data suggested that MIP may offer short-term advantages for demanding cases requiring longer OTs.