An Assessment of Individual Preference for a Novel Capillary Blood Collection System.

Patient Prefer Adherence

Clinical Affairs, Babson Diagnostics, Austin, TX, USA.

Published: March 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System's effectiveness and user satisfaction in retail settings, addressing common barriers to blood collection like discomfort and accessibility.
  • A total of 113 individuals participated, with most rating their experience positively; 90% were satisfied with the BD MiniDraw method compared to traditional venipuncture methods.
  • Key benefits reported included high trust in staff, convenience of location, and reduced collection time, indicating strong preference for this new collection system among participants.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Typical barriers to venous blood collection for wellness testing include discomfort, time spent, and collection site accessibility. This study assessed individuals' experience, satisfaction, and preference associated with a FDA-cleared blood-collection device, the BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System (BD MiniDraw), in retail locations.

Patients And Methods: A total of 113 individuals (≥18 years) with venous blood collection experience were enrolled; 107 completed the study. A pre-collection survey gathered information on demographics and past experiences with healthcare and venous blood collection settings. BD MiniDraw collection was conducted at three retail sites (two pharmacies and one grocery store) by trained healthcare workers using the Babson BetterWay blood testing service model. A follow up survey was performed two weeks later to determine experience with, and preference for, BD MiniDraw in terms of staff professionalism, blood collection location, blood collection time, and staff trustworthiness.

Results: Among the 107 participants, 74 (69%) were female and 33 (31%) were male; the mean age was 49 years (range=18-71 years). Sixty-six (62%) participants viewed their prior venipuncture experience as "somewhat" or "very" positive. Following capillary collection, 96 (90%) participants expressed a "somewhat" or "very" positive experience with BD MiniDraw at a retail location. In particular, "very satisfied" responses were given for location (87/107; 81%) and collection time (78/1407; 73%). In a subset of respondents (n=89), those reasons (location and time savings) were most frequent for likelihood of future use. Ninety-nine participants (92%) rated the retail blood collection team as "very" or "extremely" trustworthy. Overall, 90 participants (84%) "strongly preferred" (56/107; 52%), "somewhat preferred" (14/107; 13%), or had "no preference" (20/107; 19%) for BD MiniDraw, compared to traditional venous blood collection.

Conclusion: Most participants conveyed a preference for BD MiniDraw, primarily based on the blood collection retail location, perceived time savings, and professionalism and trustworthiness of the staff.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913802PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S437969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood collection
36
venous blood
16
collection
13
blood
11
capillary blood
8
collection system
8
minidraw retail
8
preference minidraw
8
collection time
8
"somewhat" "very"
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!